Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star Trek Beyond


PandaPancake

Recommended Posts

On 7/25/2016 at 0:49 PM, Promethean Forerunner said:

I meant to ask about this.

I'm interested but can the filmmakers stop "The Enterprise is dead" angle? It's growing very tiring.

Yeah, the first time was very emotional, as for it now it for, hell, I'm not sure why they keep doing it. It took 25 years to get to 1701-A, they've now done it it just over 3.5. Which was nice to jump over one of the stupidest decisions in TV history. Overall I thought it was a good movie. Get past the wft aspect of Star Trek, and except that anything can happen in this universe and enjoy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enjoyed it ok but the only really resonant things to me were the two Vulcans and the picture case at the end. They did a great job balancing the different elements and not over sexualizing the fighting female alien. Even though I was paying attention I didn't get where the alien bad guy suddenly changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ummmm the "bees" were in the form of a wave and the Beastie Boys made them explode? Seriously? I also thought the camera and editing were too quick at times. If they would've stayed on a shot for beat longer then I would've been able to process more of what I was seeing. I thought the plot was pretty thin and the acting was a bit stiff. They're all pretty good actors so it could be the writer's fault. All in all, I thought it was the worst of the remakes. Not a BAD movie but not good either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/half-panthers-draft-class-listed-010051402.html
    • So you can explain how he was top 10....but won't.  We need to look it up ourselves?  I googled it.  Can't find the argument based on stats and facts. 
    • Well, I think Nike has it all down to a sweet mathematical science to max revenue of what they average person will buy in terms of price....and what the average person will do with a dirty jersey.   Then they construct them accordingly.   and yeah, it's not about being tackled in them but I'm sure Nike knows exactly how each tier will react to washings...and then sunlight, heat, fading and on and on.    Just asking google about it there are tons of tiktoks, you tubes, reddit posts, etc with folks complaining about what a simple wash can do to a new one.    Your washing machine gets cooler tech....so you pay more now and it doesn't last as long .  My son's football cleats that help max speed got a hole in them before they even made it into the season this past year.     Now our football jersey's are lightweight with new mesh because it's totally better.....the end game is always because the big corporations have found the synergy between new and improved and not lasting as long.  That's my take.  I think everything is made to wear out sooner under the guise of but it's better today. 
×
×
  • Create New...