Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star Trek Beyond


PandaPancake

Recommended Posts

On 7/25/2016 at 0:49 PM, Promethean Forerunner said:

I meant to ask about this.

I'm interested but can the filmmakers stop "The Enterprise is dead" angle? It's growing very tiring.

Yeah, the first time was very emotional, as for it now it for, hell, I'm not sure why they keep doing it. It took 25 years to get to 1701-A, they've now done it it just over 3.5. Which was nice to jump over one of the stupidest decisions in TV history. Overall I thought it was a good movie. Get past the wft aspect of Star Trek, and except that anything can happen in this universe and enjoy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enjoyed it ok but the only really resonant things to me were the two Vulcans and the picture case at the end. They did a great job balancing the different elements and not over sexualizing the fighting female alien. Even though I was paying attention I didn't get where the alien bad guy suddenly changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ummmm the "bees" were in the form of a wave and the Beastie Boys made them explode? Seriously? I also thought the camera and editing were too quick at times. If they would've stayed on a shot for beat longer then I would've been able to process more of what I was seeing. I thought the plot was pretty thin and the acting was a bit stiff. They're all pretty good actors so it could be the writer's fault. All in all, I thought it was the worst of the remakes. Not a BAD movie but not good either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Cam was hitting his stride as a QB in 2017/2018.     This is why I think stats like completion percentage are overrated. As long as a QB is clutch and makes the throws to win the game the rest doesn’t really matter. What good is a check down stat padder if they’re a choker.  Until Norv Turner (and briefly Chud) got here we put Cam in high pressure throwing situations all the time. We also ran the ball on first down more than most teams in the NFL in the Ron era. Coupled with shitty WRs, all that is expressed in his stats. I also assume Cam took the ball in his hands on many occasions rather than trust Funchess to catch the ball.    It was also never Cams job to play the game like someone else. His presence on the field dictated the game in a way that is rarely seen.  He showed he could play the dink and dunk game just before TJ Watt. That didn’t suddenly make him better than his earlier seasons. He just got put in a legit under center  passing game again for first time since his rookie year with Chud.    Ron took the quickest path to success and abused the RPO because his ass was about to get fired.    Cam never got the credit for being the cerebral player that he was. I just think when you are legitimately a human Superman, sometimes the best play is having the ball in your hands. He was a better passer than Delhomme was. 
    • I don't think Canales has any problem benching Bryce or moving on if Bryce doesn't come out playing like the end of last year.  It's year 3 no more excuses for Bryce
    • Yea Bryce was definitely a top half qb the second half of last season but I'm not sure Canales is 100% sold on him.  Like I've said in another post I think that's part of why we talked to so many South Carolina players in the draft process.  I think they are doing early due diligence on Sellers just in case.
×
×
  • Create New...