Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KK still in negotiations


Crazydounut

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Growl said:

lol we were exact same scenario with Josh. The exact same. We were getting him in his prime on a massive one year rental and we didn't want it. You're suggesting we've completely doubled back on that philosophy and making a number of unlikely assumptions about KK himself in the scenario which all seem to conveniently benefit the Panthers regardless of how unlikely they may be.

Nope.

We would control a top 3 player at his position, in his prime, at a highly valued position on this team, for 3 years worth just North of 30M.  That's called leverage.

Again, I don't want it to play out this way, but the team has the leverage, not the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Adb6368 said:

Instead of saying just that try to enlighten me

Re-read my posts in this thread.

Since the new CBA, the teams have the majority of the leverage in contract situations...in KK's situation, we have all the leverage right now.

What I'm describing isn't what either side want, but make no mistake, KK has very little, if any leverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol we were exact same scenario with Josh. The exact same. We were getting him in his prime on a massive one year rental and we didn't want it. You're suggesting we've completely doubled back on that philosophy and making a number of unlikely assumptions about KK himself in the scenario which all seem to conveniently benefit the Panthers regardless of how unlikely they may be.

Fact: The Panthers do not value the cornerback position as much as they do DT.

Fact: Josh Norman's agent dropped the ball.

Fact: You hate Dave Gettleman and are one of the most negative posters on this board. 

Fact: KK will play for Carolina at least the next 3 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Short had to play up to the same level as last season and hope not to be tagged and not get hurt to hit the open market to make make a crazy money contract. He can't hold out either. The safe bet is to take a reasonable deal and insure he makes good monet for years to come.

I don't know where the logic is that states he has the leverage. It simply doesn't exist for him. He can't demand anything right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Re-read my posts in this thread.

Since the new CBA, the teams have the majority of the leverage in contract situations...in KK's situation, we have all the leverage right now.

What I'm describing isn't what either side want, but make no mistake, KK has very little, if any leverage.

Kawann's leverage is that he doesn't have to sign the tag until the day before the season starts and he can still get paid the full amount of the tag. Skipping all of offseason workouts, training camp and preseason with no financial penalty to him at all. That is something Gettleman just showed a great aversion to with the Norman situation. No doubt his agent will attempt to exploit that and advise KK to take the same course of action to either goad Gettleman into pulling the tag like he did with Noorman or increasing the offer at the deadline to sign a long term deal for a franchise tagged player in order to make sure KK is there for camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, csx said:

Short had to play up to the same level as last season and hope not to be tagged and not get hurt to hit the open market to make make a crazy money contract. He can't hold out either. The safe bet is to take a reasonable deal and insure he makes good monet for years to come.

 

This.  

 

For the people that are suggesting that KK doesn't want to sign a deal... you're not considering this stance.  For KK to make the contract he's supposedly demanding after this year (if a deal isnt done by week one), he would have to play most likely every game without injury and put up another 11 sacks.  Not to say that isn't possible, but this IS the NFL.  Things happen.  especially injuries.  I can guarantee you that KK does not want to play the 2016 season at the salary he's currently at.   I agree that the team has most of the leverage.  At the end of the day,  KK will blink first.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, mjligon said:

Fact: The Panthers do not value the cornerback position as much as they do DT.

Lol this being out in the open is exactly why we lack leverage

 

Quote

Fact: Josh Norman's agent dropped the ball.

What lol? He got his player the highest paid contract at his position in the entire league. 

Quote

Fact: You hate Dave Gettleman and are one of the most negative posters on this board. 

lol you can't tell your butt from a BBQ and have revealed yourself as nothing more than a homer with no critical thinking skills and nothing to add to this conversation or any other.

Quote

Fact: KK will play for Carolina at least the next 3 seasons.

Man I'd hate to see how much Gettleman gives up if this comes true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

Lol this being out in the open is exactly why we lack leverage

 

What lol? He got his player the highest paid contract at his position in the entire league. 

lol you can't tell your butt from a BBQ and have revealed yourself as nothing more than a homer with no critical thinking skills and nothing to add to this conversation or any other.

Man I'd hate to see how much Gettleman gives up if this comes true.

BAhahaha.

Josh Norman fired his agent before he got his deal...

i don't even feel the need to respond to the rest now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Nope.

We would control a top 3 player at his position, in his prime, at a highly valued position on this team, for 3 years worth just North of 30M.  That's called leverage.

Again, I don't want it to play out this way, but the team has the leverage, not the player.

Saying "nope" doesn't invalidate what I just said just because you want it to.

 

The team has made it demonstrably clear they don't want to go that route, and KK's agent is going to push that button over and over and over again pressuring them to cave or to let him walk.

 

"but they can just tag him!"

They don't want to tag him.

"Maybe they change their mind."

And KK sits out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mjligon said:

BAhahaha.

Josh Norman fired his agent before he got his deal...

i don't even feel the need to respond to the rest now.

omg you think there was any measure of meaningful negotiation between Norman's camp and the Skins that's adorable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...