Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marlowe is doubtful, Klein and Vern are questionable for tomm game


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Look for Marcus Ball to be activated from the practice squad.

If we do that doesn't he have to sign for at least a few games? I know he is making the trip but that decision is longer than just this game right? Or do I have that all wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

If we do that doesn't he have to sign for at least a few games? I know he is making the trip but that decision is longer than just this game right? Or do I have that all wrong?

Incorrect. We sign him off the PS but have to cut one player form our 53 (prob Jared Norris) to do so. We can then cut Ball after the game if we choose to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Incorrect. We sign him off the PS but have to cut one player form our 53 (prob Jared Norris) to do so. We can then cut Ball after the game if we choose to.

Am I thinking of when we sign someone off of another team's Practice Squad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Good posting. Questionable now just means "we don't know" if the player will play. I think we see more doubtfuls showing up on injury reports where a player is unlikely. Questionable was kind of 50-50 before, but I think questionable is now anything from there's a chance the player won't play all the way to he might play. Doubtful is now the new good chance they won't play. If the player is pretty much playing, they aren't going to be on the report at all, not probable.

I disagree, IMO probable guys I think will simply become questionable guys under the new format. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I think some may, but given that 95% of probables ended up playing, I thought the goal was to remove the people who everyone knew was playing from the injury report. That said, you could be right that now everyone is just questionable unless they are unlikely to play. I hope that isn't the case because then there's really no point to it at all. Could be based upon teams, like the Patriots.

No, questionable is still the same except probable is grouped into it. If the person has a 50% chance or better or playing, then they are questionable now. Basically, questionable is now just more confusing and less helpful. Thank god the NFL clarified injuries! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

Am I thinking of when we sign someone off of another team's Practice Squad?

There's no requirement for keeping someone from the PS, as far as them physically being on the active roster.  You can sign someone from your own squad, or another team's squad, and cut them the next day.  Payment may be what you're thinking about.  Once signed from the PS, you have to pay them league minimum salary for a certain amount of weeks.  I'm thinking 3 or 4 weeks, but can't recall exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...