Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is Telling

FutureDynasty

By FutureDynasty,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

FutureDynasty Community Regular

FutureDynasty

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Another gem, this time from a BRONCOS fan:

I’ve gotta say, I woke up this morning with a bit of shame at being a Broncos fan. Coach Kubiak needs to get this house in order. There were some definite cheap shots out there and they represented us horribly. Embarrassing.

Darian(Stewart) probably deserves to be suspended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Veteran

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted

Dudes, go read the facebook comments on the NFL.com articles. Most of the time 95% of the comments are bashing Cam but it is definitely flip flopped, 95% of the comments are supporting the fact that the Panthers and Cam were subject to several no calls. This may be the incident that actually tips the scales in favor of people attempting to understand him as a person and logic finally prevailing after 6 years of nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Veteran

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, FutureDynasty said:

Another gem, this time from a BRONCOS fan:

I’ve gotta say, I woke up this morning with a bit of shame at being a Broncos fan. Coach Kubiak needs to get this house in order. There were some definite cheap shots out there and they represented us horribly. Embarrassing.

Darian(Stewart) probably deserves to be suspended.

The fans also mention Marshall as warranting suspension and/or hefty fine. Almost no one is defending the play from last night and you rarely see a consensus decision as to dirty play in regards to the NFL due to there being 32 different teams. Comments from people all across the world on NFL.com are actually in agreement that the hits were illegal. 

This is the beginning of the equivalent of "White Stalions" being broadcast across the globe at the end of "Bogus Journey". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, panther4life said:

Heard similar things from several fans of different teams. Even a bronco fan said the refs blew it but wouldn't go as far to blame his players. Such a fuging joke. The loss sucks, but my main focus/rage is on this subject.

Yeah, we can all handle a loss (or most of us can....) but when there is a blatant rigging of the game. The NFL needs to be publicly shamed for this. If players can stand behind Keapernick and his misguided protest, then everybody, players, fans, owners, media need to shame the refs until they are fired. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...