Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke Kuechly passes Jon Beason


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

One thing I've noticed so far this year is Luke seems much more emotional out on the field.  I think this goes to his leadership.  I think he sees the need for it given that we don't have a presence like Josh Norman or Mike Mitchell in that role, and he has stepped up to fill it.  Kuechly is truly a special talent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

One thing I've noticed so far this year is Luke seems much more emotional out on the field.  I think this goes to his leadership.  I think he sees the need for it given that we don't have a presence like Josh Norman or Mike Mitchell in that role, and he has stepped up to fill it.  Kuechly is truly a special talent.

 

are you saying Mike Mitchell and Josh Norman were better leaders than Luke? I'm confused. Also I've never seen Luke not fired up on the field. He talks poo all game long every game. I love it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

are you saying Mike Mitchell and Josh Norman were better leaders than Luke? I'm confused. Also I've never seen Luke not fired up on the field. He talks poo all game long every game. I love it

Luke is the brain of the defense but those guys were the attitude everyone fed off of. I'd put Hardy in there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Daddy_Uncle said:

are you saying Mike Mitchell and Josh Norman were better leaders than Luke? I'm confused. Also I've never seen Luke not fired up on the field. He talks poo all game long every game. I love it

Absolutely not.  Luke has always been a leader, just to me he seems more emotional on a consistent basis than he has in years past.  He has always talked poo, just think he is more in offensive guys faces more than he has in the past.  Regardless, I'm loving it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...