Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You think the panthers have it bad with refs?? think again


Toolbox

Recommended Posts

Pryor's taunting penalty in week 2 or 3, I think, was also pretty questionable. He was clearly flipping the ball to the ref and it landed on a fallen DB and he got called for taunting as they were in the red zone looking to tie or win with 10 seconds left in the 4th quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Toolbox said:

Yeah the norman bow and arrow which wasn't even directed at a person got flagged??? and I thought the NBA was bad with the dumb fouls you can get just for laughing on the bench.. lol wtf is going on with professional sports?

The NFL wants to project an image of distinctiveness and classiness while they have guys on their rosters who abuse women and children

also they want the teams with the most established heritages to be more successful 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toolbox said:

Also the play was not reviewed and given back to the browns.. so yeah fug you NFL.

OK, I'm not sayin...

But the tiny official in the huge hat that signaled Redskins ball?

That's the NFL token female official right?

Like I said, I'm just sayin'...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

The NFL wants to project an image of distinctiveness and classiness while they have guys on their rosters who abuse women and children

also they want the teams with the most established heritages to be more successful 

Yes.

And you forgot they want to turn Cam Newton's brain into jelly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

OK, I'm not sayin...

But the tiny official in the huge hat that signaled Redskins ball?

That's the NFL token female official right?

Like I said, I'm just sayin'...

Yikes I never noticed it was that lady ref..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...