Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman


The_Rainmaker

Is this season Gettleman & his FUPA's fault.  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. GM



Recommended Posts

 

2 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Yeah, questionable coaching decisions and sloppy play have nothing to do with our record.

 

yea its not like the GM gave us probably the worst secondary in panthers lifespan. You can coach up all you want to but when you lack of talent this severe there is nothing you can do to cover it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The_Rainmaker said:

yea its not like the GM gave us probably the worst secondary in panthers lifespan. You can coach up all you want to but when you lack of talent this severe there is nothing you can do to cover it up. 

Sounds like a combination of factors.  Gettleman isn't making personnel changes without discussing them first with Ron and his coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

to throw 2 starting rookie corners to the wolves on a superbowl caliber team is the dumbest thing any GM could ever do. 

I mean im glad he drafted Bradberry but letting Norman walk for nothing while not addressign OTs & DE is just fuging stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not all Gettlemans fault, but he gets a good chunk of the blame. He is tasked with supplying the coaches the players or talent for them to be able to effectively run their respective schemes. He did not do that. Let the all pro CB that Rivera built up go, let the vets go without properly replacing them with other vets. Instead, he brings in 3 rookie CB's. Didn't really add much to the team, as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...