Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What was different with the offense in the second half?


KSpan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

They allowed Cam to run the no huddle. Lined up with 15 seconds+ on the play clock. Allowed Cam to look over the defense and make adjustments.

Better than getting play call in late and breaking huddle only to have 3 to 5 seconds to read the defense.

Exactly.. cam was allowed to be cam for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We did use the hurry up and Cam was throwing in rhythm and to spots.  In the first half he was holding the ball and waiting for receivers to uncover.  We used the run more effectively and kept them off balance.  I promise you when we were only behind by 7 I promise you they werent playing prevent.  But as wide open as their receivers were most of the day you would think we were. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Toolbox said:

Exactly.. cam was allowed to be cam for once.

Wrong again.  THey ran the no huddle and Cam got in rhythm and did a great job.  Other games we have run the no huddle and went 3 and out which puts more pressure on the defense if they have been out on the field all day.  It isnt doing or not doing it, it is doing what works.  If it doesnt we try other things and if it does we keep doing it.   Cam runs this offense and it is built around stop.  The notion that he cant do what he wants is really beyond stupid. You act like Shula does thing to stop the offense on purpose and hold Cam back.  That is just beyond ridiculous.  You have to know that he wants Cam to do great and will do everything he can to do that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...