Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Fox was fired, would he resurface as a DC or HC?


charlottenian

Recommended Posts

he would get another HC job right away. he would go to his new team and have success within a season or two by taking them back to fundamentals. most people here will say 'look what we let go, he's winning elsewhere.'

then in 5 years all of the problems on the team that he has refused to acknowledged will build up, the players will stop believing in him and realize all he knows is fundamentals, and they will be extremely inconsistent.

repeat process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only team I could see Fox coach would be for the Texans in case they do fire Kubiak

Well I want him as our O-Coordinator then he is great at turning minimal RB talent into a 1000 yard rusher (something the Broncos weren't as successful at after he left) think what he could do with Williams and Stewart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only team I could see Fox coach would be for the Texans in case they do fire Kubiak

I could see him getting the Redskins job if Zorn is let go (very possible).

Shanahan is probably waiting to become the next Cowboys coach. Schottenheimer's already had the Dan Snyder experience, and I think Cowher already told Snyder no once before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see him getting the Redskins job if Zorn is let go (very possible).

Shanahan is probably waiting to become the next Cowboys coach. Schottenheimer's already had the Dan Snyder experience, and I think Cowher already told Snyder no once before.

Zorn is as good as gone along with Jason Campbell.... The skins will look at how teams have done with rookie QB's (Jets, Falcons, Ravens) and sell the farm next year to bring in either McCoy or Bradford

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...