Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The first two College Playoff Games.


iamhubby1

Recommended Posts

Did anyone that watched them, like how they showed them? Man, it was awful. 5 split screens at one time. At first I thought it was just for the pregame. But then it just went on, and on. And then they did it for the second game. Who cares what the Coach is doing on the sideline? I like stats, but I don't need a constant screen shot of them. Oh look, they ran the ball, and the stat line moved accordingly. How Cool.

 

I did kind of get used to the split screens for the plays. The normal one from the sidelines above the 50 was easy to get used to. That shot from the flying Camera above the field took a little getting used to. I watched the plays from the over head, and watched the replays from the normal camera angle.

 

But all in all, who needs 5 screen shots? It's football, not the fuging Academy Awards.

 

So no. I didn't like it. Not one little bit.

 

Panther related. If enough weirdos like this sort of thing. We just may see it in the future. So if any of you see a weirdo. Kick them in the nads, and tell them to leave our football alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They were awful, uncompetitive games. The NCAA got exactly what they deserved in the Clemson/OSU game putting an Ohio State team that couldn't even qualify for their own conference championship game into the four team playoff. What a crock.

Would be amazing if they just go in a bracket system for the playoffs, and shorten the regular season a little bit to compensate.

It'd be like march madness but for the NCAA. That would definitely amp ratings and drive competitiveness.

Honestly hate how the current playoff system is. Just complete trash imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe a bit of a homer take but I can't give us a grade lower than A.   Freeling was arguably the best LT prospect in the draft.  His athletic ability is off the chart and at 6'7" that can move.  It was a no brainer pick.   Hunter's key word is Violence. Putting him next to Brown should scare an offensive coordinator. These two give Scourton and Phillips plenty of chances to get one on one opportunities. Brazzell, another tall receiver with sprinter speed.  Our WR room is filled with tall talented WR.  Brazzell is going to give us a WR that can take to roof off the defense.  Basically Jimmy Horn with size. W. Lee III has a nickname of the Blanket. (heard this on the Beleav podcast with J. Stewart)  What a great name.  A great value in the 5th round. Hecht A strong, fast and extremely smart center. Many had him listed as the best center in the draft.  He's most likely a starter sooner than later. Wheatley A good safety in round 5.  Someone who could see playing time.   Kuwatch  I love this pick.  At minimum he will be a key piece on special teams and with some good coaching he'll see some packages where he'll play.  His down piece is he doesn't stay up in the running game.  Good coaching will fix this.  He reminds me a bit of A.J. Klein.   All these picks were great value.  I believe everyone of them were graded higher than the pick we took them.   Dan Morgan is IMO doing a great job turning this team into a good team with great depth.
    • Moton is a class act.  
    • Sure, that is possible. That’s what, an extra 55 yards a game on average and 7 more TDs? What if he’s just 15th?  I imagine they would extend him in that situation due to the belief that he’ll keep trending up. maybe a 3 year contract to prove he can be top 10? Sounds like a Tepper plan.
×
×
  • Create New...