Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Regarding the Seahawks meltdown/demise


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Even after a disappointing injury-filled season, you have to like where the Panthers stand in regards to their locker room leaders: Cam, Olsen, TD, Kuechly, Kalil etc.

The same can't be said for the Seahawks. It appears Russell Wilson isn't the savoir the "twelves" made him out to be. The choir boy, holier than thou attitude doesn't work in NFL locker rooms after all, I guess. Richard Sherman has shown this season what kind of person he is. Earl Thomas can't seem to decide if he is retiring or not, but I'm sure he'll let us know via twitter soon enough. Michael Bennett is a head case.

 

The NFC will be ripe for the taking again next season. Atlanta may or may not go to the SB this season, but regardless it appears they could be a one hit wonder once Shanahan heads west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

Well let's see. The Seahawks are in the Playoffs yesr after year including 2 Super Bowls meanwhile we can't go above .500 two years in a row.

 

this year it helped having three division II teams in their division

 

btw, I'll take the 8th pick in a loaded draft over a 9-7 finish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...the Huddle has been calling their demise each year, every year, for years yet they keep staying relevant and heading to the playoffs. "Wilson a lucky / one hit wonder, locker room falling apart, they are in cap hell now, without Lynch they are nothing, can't pay to keep the defense together, Pete Carroll looks like a lesbian......."

 

That last part has nothing to do with it really but it's funny and kinda true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...