Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SS Calvin Pryor, Jets, '14 #18 overall pick, likely available via trade


Nails

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

...disappointing jets safety...  That link header man. :/

Yet most here want the V E R Y disappointing Matt Kalil who has been in the league two more years and has major injury issues to boot protecting Cam's blindside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

You don't get to have two teams here....

Absolutely horrible job of letting Panthers fans who have no clue what it's like to have "two teams" and never care to know what it's like.

Regardless, we need a way to move Coleman back to his natural position as it was obvious that our set-up this season failed. 

It's hard to completely forget about your team before the Panthers. I was a Skins fan for as long as I can remember. I always enjoy watching some of the old games on the NFL channel. Greene, Monk, Grimm, Williams, Riggins, and the list goes on. Was even a fan of Joe Gibbs. 

Could never be a fan of that team in Georgia getting ready to open the sphincter bowl though.  Good to know my instincts as a child were good. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MV%doe said:

Nah, I'm talking in general NFL team building, in overall value terms. Example: #1-QB, #2-DE/3-4OLB, #3-LT etc etc. Where would you put SS on a value ranking?

Ahhh gotcha. 

I think the SAF position as a whole needs one stud. Whether it's at FS or SS, I think you need one guy to lock it all down back there. I prefer it to be SS because I like physicality and actually prefer a hybrid 'rover' or 'moneybacker'. I think it's crucial to have these guys in today's NFL to cover the TE or even RBs that get out in the flat, as well as protecting the CBs against WRs. 

Overall, I think there are more important positions. SS or SAF as a whole I would put farther down. A rough rough draft of position rankings for me would be....

QB - kinda goes without saying

DE - you need a monster to get after the QB and disrupt the LOS

OT - pref LT, but that's even changing where RTs are closing the gap on importance with the athleticism of QBs and opposing DEs. 

MLB - captain of the defense usually and the glue of the back 7 to the front 4

RB1 - you need to pound the ball. whether its to set up the pass or just balance out an aerial attack. a RB1 is vital

WR1 - right after RB1 you need a threat at wideout. passing league so you need a weapon for your QB to connect with.

CB1 - see above WR1. must have at least one top notch CB that can run with opposing teams top WR. doesn't have to be Patrick Peterson, but def need a confident CB on one side of the field. 

DT - gotta get push and occupy space in the trenches. also have to be able to neutralize interior running game and open gaps for the LBs and DBs to fire through.

SAF - this is about where I put the position. I think I could make a case for TE or WLB, but having a stud as the last line of defense makes such a difference. If you get the right type of SAF, it could flex into that WLB spot in certain packages. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Soul Rebel said:

For the Panthers this offseason? ---  SS is 1a, 1b or 1c for me. I think we need a LT, DE and SS equally as bad. LT seems the most important, but with the least amount of impact options available. SS would be a close second with a pass rushing edge DE right behind that. I go back and forth on these 3 positions, but for me a complimentary young SS beside Coleman would solidify our defense.

I'm the opposite, we need to get TE/RB/OL that can control the entire tempo of the game. Secondary play will improve with the growth of the CBs, we need a Veteran Safety like Berry, if not we can use a mid round pick on Safety 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Nails said:

Yet most here want the V E R Y disappointing Matt Kalil who has been in the league two more years and has major injury issues to boot protecting Cam's blindside.

On a "prove it" deal similar to Oher's initial contract? Sure. We have to do SOMETHING to address depth at LT. I don't think anyone is wanting to hand Kalil any serious guaranteed money. That wouldn't be a very smart risk to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

On a "prove it" deal similar to Oher's initial contract? Sure. We have to do SOMETHING to address depth at LT. I don't think anyone is wanting to hand Kalil any serious guaranteed money. That wouldn't be a very smart risk to take.

I'm not against a Kalil signing.  I am against a Kalil signing without hedging the bet in at least one or two major or somewhat major ways.

For this thread I was just pointing out that anyone calling Pryor disappointing but still clamoring for Kalil was hypocritical.

Pryor simply represents one of many ways to skin the SS cat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2017 at 6:05 AM, Soul Rebel said:

Ahhh gotcha. 

I think the SAF position as a whole needs one stud. Whether it's at FS or SS, I think you need one guy to lock it all down back there. I prefer it to be SS because I like physicality and actually prefer a hybrid 'rover' or 'moneybacker'. I think it's crucial to have these guys in today's NFL to cover the TE or even RBs that get out in the flat, as well as protecting the CBs against WRs. 

Overall, I think there are more important positions. SS or SAF as a whole I would put farther down. A rough rough draft of position rankings for me would be....

QB - kinda goes without saying

DE - you need a monster to get after the QB and disrupt the LOS

OT - pref LT, but that's even changing where RTs are closing the gap on importance with the athleticism of QBs and opposing DEs. 

MLB - captain of the defense usually and the glue of the back 7 to the front 4

RB1 - you need to pound the ball. whether its to set up the pass or just balance out an aerial attack. a RB1 is vital

WR1 - right after RB1 you need a threat at wideout. passing league so you need a weapon for your QB to connect with.

CB1 - see above WR1. must have at least one top notch CB that can run with opposing teams top WR. doesn't have to be Patrick Peterson, but def need a confident CB on one side of the field. 

DT - gotta get push and occupy space in the trenches. also have to be able to neutralize interior running game and open gaps for the LBs and DBs to fire through.

SAF - this is about where I put the position. I think I could make a case for TE or WLB, but having a stud as the last line of defense makes such a difference. If you get the right type of SAF, it could flex into that WLB spot in certain packages. 

Yes this is one of those that has vastly differing opinions among many. My opinion has changed, cause change is constant. I use to list OG at the bottom, but I had to increase the value. My newest bottom is SS. That's why I don't see the value at #8, unless it's a Sean Taylor/Ed reed ver2.349. I do see the benefit to having one stud at safety. Plus having a Luke at MLB, changes the formula too. 

Your list seems to value RB way high, but there is no wrong answer, unless QB isn't #1.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...