Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How a 'Bad Move' sticks with a Franchise


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Drafting DJ Augustine over Brook Lopez (2008 Draft):
I think we all knew this was a bad move right when it happened.

If you don't remember - We have drafted, at #9 overall mind you, an undersized PG to come off the bench behind Felton - while ignoring the potential Allstar Center - when your bigs were Okafor (often injured), Diop (bleh) and Nazr (old). You don't have to wait months or years to see the affects of this terrible pick - all it takes is minutes. We also had the #20 pick. In this draft we wanted to walk away Guard and Big. We took the PG first and Hoping one of the other bigs would fall (Hibbert, JaVale, JJ Hickson or Ajinca). A run happened and all we were left with was Ajinca. If we took Lopez at #9, we still would have been able to grab (#22) Courtney Lee, (#25) Nick Batum or (#26) George Hill with the #20 pick. So instead of one bad pick - we doubled down and grabbed 2 terrible picks.

Instead of swallowing our pride and admitting we goofed - the next year - we draft Hendo instead of Allstars PGs = Jrue holiday and Jeff Teague - also there was Ty Lawson who wasn't an Allstar but was much better than Augustine. All three were taken just 4 picks after Hendo. But no worries - We now we have our SG of the future (who can't shoot the 3pt shot). Congrats - 1 bad move has now evolved into 3 really, really bad moves. It only took another season for everything to collapse and we completely started a rebuild after shipping Stephen Jackson and Gerald Wallace out for picks and players.

Signing Lance Stephenson (2014):
This one we all thought was a great move when it happened. I remember where I was when I heard the announcement come over the radio on my way to work.

By the time we figured it out, we were midway through the season and he had become a locker room cancer. We needed to move his contract - or did we? We had signed him to a 2 yr deal with a 3rd year team option. We were already done the 1st year when we decided to ship him to the Clipper for Spencer Hawes. Hawes had 3 years left on his terrible contract. So we basically flipped a bad contract for a even longer bad contract. But it didn't end there. After letting Hawes play for a year and a half (again, almost through with him..) - we decided to flip him for Plumlee. Probably the worst contract/deal I have seen since we traded Tyson Chandler for Erick Dampier.

So essentially, the Lance deal (3yr 27mil w/player option for 3rd) has caused us to go to Plumlee (4yr 48mil). When you keep kicking the can down the road - this is what happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not drafting Lopez was definitely an "ouch" moment.

 

Plumlee trade looks terrible because Hibbert would come off the books and Hawes shortly after (although his 6 mil per looks fantastic in today's market even if he elected to opt into his player option).

 

I keep thinking, with our current contracts...is it even possible to make a competitive play for Curry on the dream scenario that he wants to come "home?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after thinking about our franchise for the past few days and how terrible we really are - i think we need to stop protesting DeVos and Trump and start protesting Cho..

For some reason I thought he was decent at trades and FAs but just sucked at drafts.. now I'm really thinking he is just an overall terrible GM..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

Nah I'm still protesting DeVos and Trump

not trying to get this thrown in the tinderbox but... hell mutha-fuggin yeah!!

all my dummie friends, who i used to never be able to have a political conversation with - they now are totally pluggin in to what is going on.. possibly the only good thing the Orange King has done..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bad move after bad move with cho.

besides from the draft, terrible trade after terrible trade, signing lance stephenson and other horrible signings. Oh but he signed Marvin Williams and Nic Batum so hes a good GM in some people's eyes. Give me a great. If he wasn't MJs little bitch boy he would have been fired a long time ago

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cho is completely in over his head.  He has no eye for talent which is a trait he shares with MJ.  Unfortunately, he's willing to agree with everything MJ says, and that's how we've ended up in this situation.  No other professional sports franchise that I'm aware of can say they're owned by the GOAT.  That's pretty damn cool.  However, MJ needs to hire a real GM and stay completely out of the operations of this team.  He's the real problem.  He can't stay out of his own way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...