Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Draft Film Analysis & Breakdown: Leonard Fournette


Saca312

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Cyberjag said:

Gettleman has said time and again that big men let you compete.  I could see him taking Soloman Thomas or Derek Barnette even if Fournette is available.  Not saying I agree with that, but I could see it.

As for the Jaguars, I think they would be more likely to take Dalvin Cooke.  They need a playmaker to help Bortles, and Cooke is the better fit for them.  They already have a power back in Ivory.

Barnett is my 1a to my Fournette 1b.  Equally ecstatic with both but positional value and team need would rue the day gun to head for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cyberjag said:

Gettleman has said time and again that big men let you compete.  I could see him taking Soloman Thomas or Derek Barnette even if Fournette is available.  Not saying I agree with that, but I could see it.

As for the Jaguars, I think they would be more likely to take Dalvin Cooke.  They need a playmaker to help Bortles, and Cooke is the better fit for them.  They already have a power back in Ivory.

PS Ramczyk remains a dark horse for that reason.  I want experience and reliability at LT NOW and that doesn't come with a rookie with an injury.  But maybe we really do sign Berry, DJax, JPP, and the other teams with LT's and no hope drive too hard a bargain, leaving us with no real answer in late April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Nails said:

Barnett is my 1a to my Fournette 1b.  Equally ecstatic with both but positional value and team need would rue the day gun to head for me.

I'll probably do some analysis on Barnett later, but right now I think he has the lowest ceiling against guys like Charlton and Thomas. 

I'll give he is the most NFL ready of the DEs and peaked early, but he doesn't have the appealing size to take his game to the next level. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lasus83
I'll probably do some analysis on Barnett later, but right now I think he has the lowest ceiling against guys like Charlton and Thomas. 

I'll give he is the most NFL ready of the DEs and peaked early, but he doesn't have the appealing size to take his game to the next level. 

 


The thing is, about Barnett, is that he possesses the intangibles that cannot be taught.

He is an effort guy, a passion guy and a leader.

He is exactly what we lost when Hardy left (remember the Kraken, the facepaint, the feeling that we have an insane person on the line), and to a lesser extent, Norman.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lasus83 said:


The thing is, about Barnett, is that he possesses the intangibles that cannot be taught.

He is an effort guy, a passion guy and a leader.

He is exactly what we lost when Hardy left (remember the Kraken, the facepaint, the feeling that we have an insane person on the line), and to a lesser extent, Norman.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

He puts his full effort. I'm not doubting he'll be productive. I'm just not seeing him becoming a name for himself and dominating.

I mean I originally was rooting for the kid and thinking he'd be a great fit. But looking at his measurables saddens me, because not all monster size DEs have his intelligence, and he doesn't have the dominating measurables.

He's going to be a good DE. He just won't be that explosive DE that will dominate in the NFL like he did in college. He'll get stuff done because he's sound mentally, but I can't see him having multiple double digit sack seasons.

I do hope I'm wrong, because I really like the kid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lasus83
He puts his full effort. I'm not doubting he'll be productive. I'm just not seeing him becoming a name for himself and dominating.

I mean I originally was rooting for the kid and thinking he'd be a great fit. But looking at his measurables saddens me, because not all monster size DEs have his intelligence, and he doesn't have the dominating measurables.

He's going to be a good DE. He just won't be that explosive DE that will dominate in the NFL like he did in college. He'll get stuff done because he's sound mentally, but I can't see him having multiple double digit sack seasons.

I do hope I'm wrong, because I really like the kid. 


Hell, I hope GMs agree with you and he slips to the 20s... so we can trade up and pick him.

Trade 2.8 and 3.8 for a 20s pick... Draft goes:

1. Fournette
1b. Barnett
3 comp. Leggett
4. Rod Johnson/Tankersley/Garcia/Pocic

I'm gonna go towel off now.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lasus83

Hell, I hope GMs agree with you and he slips to the 20s... so we can trade up and pick him.

Trade 2.8 and 3.8 for a 20s pick... Draft goes:

1. Fournette
1b. Barnett
3 comp. Leggett
4. Rod Johnson/Tankersley/Garcia/Pocic

I'm gonna go towel off now.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app


Oooor...

Trade next year 1st, which we all know will be 1.32 anyway aaaaand trade up with 2.8 and 3.8... have 3 1sts.

1. Fournette
1b. Barnett
1c. Howard
3 comp. Rod Johnson
4. Tankersley
5. Pocic

Aaaaand I'm spent.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

He puts his full effort. I'm not doubting he'll be productive. I'm just not seeing him becoming a name for himself and dominating.

I mean I originally was rooting for the kid and thinking he'd be a great fit. But looking at his measurables saddens me, because not all monster size DEs have his intelligence, and he doesn't have the dominating measurables.

He's going to be a good DE. He just won't be that explosive DE that will dominate in the NFL like he did in college. He'll get stuff done because he's sound mentally, but I can't see him having multiple double digit sack seasons.

I do hope I'm wrong, because I really like the kid. 

I think you're wrong (he is only 20 and will grow after all), but if he goes to the Saints like multiple mocks predict, I hope you're right!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nails said:

I think you're wrong (he is only 20 and will grow after all), but if he goes to the Saints like multiple mocks predict, I hope you're right!!

That's true. I personally feel his potential frame is not that high, but he does have room to grow.

He's just not the type of guy to build up to a monster. If we get him, I hope I'm proven wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Nice write up. I really hope he's there at 8

 

18 hours ago, Krovvy said:

The Jaguars should take him.

 

18 hours ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

If we keep running a zone read style run game, Fournette will have all his weaknesses thrusted into the spot light.  If he can line up 8 yards deep, ala Adrian Peterson, he'll be the back everyone expects him to be. 

 

This has to be one of the  worst game to criticize Fournette espeically with a QB who couldnt throw the ball for damn & while everyone is playing to stop the run. Just look at the difference in production after LSU made the QB change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone on this board is going to throw a rage fit when Fournette is available at 8 and Gettleman picks Tabor , Humphrey, or Lattimore. Because its looking like the #1 CB in the draft will be there when we pick and he's probably salivating at the chance of getting another top shelf CB to go opposite Bradberry. And honestly that wouldn't be a terrible move even though I'd still want Fournette more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Everyone on this board is going to throw a rage fit when Fournette is available at 8 and Gettleman picks Tabor , Humphrey, or Lattimore. Because its looking like the #1 CB in the draft will be there when we pick and he's probably salivating at the chance of getting another top shelf CB to go opposite Bradberry. And honestly that wouldn't be a terrible move even though I'd still want Fournette more.

I have a feeling jets will take lattimore, if not a qb(still a good chance of that I guess). 

 

Anyways seems like a great write up op buts it's 3:30 and I really need to go to bed lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sanjay_rajput said:

 

 

 

This has to be one of the  worst game to criticize Fournette espeically with a QB who couldnt throw the ball for damn & while everyone is playing to stop the run. Just look at the difference in production after LSU made the QB change.

He actually played well the first 2 games. 6ypc is nothing to be ashamed of against a team like Wisconsin.

The bad QB play the first 2 games didn't seem to have any affect on his performance statistically. Both were good games for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎2‎/‎12‎/‎2017 at 1:52 AM, X-Clown on 1 said:

If we keep running a zone read style run game, Fournette will have all his weaknesses thrusted into the spot light.  If he can line up 8 yards deep, ala Adrian Peterson, he'll be the back everyone expects him to be. 

I can totally see us drafting him and then neutering him with our read option bs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...