Some notes from my source

[SOJA]

1 hour ago, davos said:

Being from a Chi town sports fam, I frequent this board and there's a guy who usually has sources saying they've met with Kizer 4 times 

http://www.chicitysports.com/forum/showthread.php/87114-Is-UKbearsfan1-right-Kizer-meets-with-Bears-again-4th-time

What an out of nowhere pick that would be.

I would cry tears of pure joy. That would be INCREDIBLE

[SOJA]

1 hour ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

 

If that's true, then McCaffrey ain't the pick, not even Fournette. If Adams or Thomas falls...

From what Jeremy has said it seems like Fournette might be number two on the Panthers board right behind Garrett. Though I personally prefer Adams and Thomas over Fournette

[SOJA]

1 hour ago, Verge said:

Text from him:
"Two maybe three qbs in top 10, Bears sold on one"

Hmmm

OMG I think I'm going to cum

[Ivan The Awesome]

37 minutes ago, SOJA said:

From what Jeremy has said it seems like Fournette might be number two on the Panthers board right behind Garrett. Though I personally prefer Adams and Thomas over Fournette

If we pick up Fournette over Adams or Thomas if they're still on the board I'll definitely rage. 

[LinvilleGorge]

I won't. I wouldn't take any player other than Garrett over Fournette. Not for our team.

[Saca312]

2 hours ago, Verge said:

I would guess a smokescreen as well, I was pretty convinced they go Hooker or Adams.

Well what do you think John Fox values? Does he value a safety that much?

If I remember, the Bears got a solid safety from free agency. Might be the reason why.

If 2 or 3 QBs go, that gives us a likely shot at a solid prospect. 

[LinvilleGorge]

IF this talk of three QBs potentially in the top 10 is accurate - and I think that's a big "if" - it gives credibility to the reports that the Browns are torn between Garrett and Trubisky. I'm sure they see Garrett as the top talent in he draft, but they've desperately needed a QB for decades now. If you're not going to have a shot at one at #12 or a reasonable trade up (like to #8 for instance), then you have to seriously consider taking that QB at #1. Look at the Texans with JJ Watt. Probably the most dominant DE since Reggie White and they've got nothing to show for his career because they don't have a QB.

[csx]

In my very amateur opinion, if we don't have good run blocking line and an effective fullback then Leonard might not have a significant effect. 

[The Lobo]

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

IF this talk of three QBs potentially in the top 10 is accurate - and I think that's a big "if" - it gives credibility to the reports that the Browns are torn between Garrett and Trubisky. I'm sure they see Garrett as the top talent in he draft, but they've desperately needed a QB for decades now. If you're not going to have a shot at one at #12 or a reasonable trade up (like to #8 for instance), then you have to seriously consider taking that QB at #1. Look at the Texans with JJ Watt. Probably the most dominant DE since Reggie White and they've got nothing to show for his career because they don't have a QB.

Very good points. It worked with us with Cam. Many scouts said he was good but shouldn't be number 1. Many pundits said we should have taken Miller or Dareus and get a veteran Qb. We went with Cam and he's made us great. 

I posted earlier that one douche nozzle on ESPN swears that the browns are going Watson number 1. Who knows if it's true or not. I think teams are starting to realize they need a qb.

[SOJA]

39 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

If we pick up Fournette over Adams or Thomas if they're still on the board I'll definitely rage. 

I agree- I'm just saying reading the tea leaves 

[csx]

And if you want a back that you just bash in to the defense over and over wait and pick up Perine

[LinvilleGorge]

Perine is nowhere close to Fournette's league. 

[csx]

4 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Very good points. It worked with us with Cam. Many scouts said he was good but shouldn't be number 1. Many pundits said we should have taken Miller or Dareus and get a veteran Qb. We went with Cam and he's made us great. 

I posted earlier that one douche nozzle on ESPN swears that the browns are going Watson number 1. Who knows if it's true or not. I think teams are starting to realize they need a qb.

Just to play devil's advocate. The Broncos picked Miller, got a veteran qb and won a super bowl with 4 consecutive 12+ win seasons.

[csx]

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Perine is nowhere close to Fournette's league. 

Not suggesting that. I'm suggesting Leonard might not be that effective here this season and might get damaged before we build the type of system he needs. I don't see him as a slam dunk with who we have and what we do. You can invest much less in a battering ram if that's what you want.