Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL network talking what if's about McCaffrey, Panthers at 8.


Recommended Posts

“Big running backs are nice. They tend to run people over better than 180-pound running backs. But this is a deep group, we know that. And it’ll be interesting to see how the whole process plays out, because we’re really just halfway through it. You’ve got to evaluate the film and get a picture of every individual running back. Then you talk about ‘fit’ and then we go from there.”

Gettleman on running backs earlier this off-season. 

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2017/03/02/panthers-gm-dave-gettleman-admits-team-is-looking-at-rb-in-2017-nfl-draft/

To you guys ''day-dreaming'' about McCaffery you may want to defer to this. We're not taking a gadget player at #8. If Fournetter is there he's the pick. If not I still do not believe it's McCaffery.

He doesn't FIT anything that this offense does from a physicality standpoint. There are plenty of runners with similar size and skill sets. He's not a to of the 1st round talent in the NFL, he's a specialty player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best case scenario:  Trade back a few spots, pick up McC, and use the ammo from that trade back to possibly move up at the end of the 1st and grab Njoku or some other impact offensive player.

 

If that isn't possible, I'm not hating on this pick at 8 at all.  Instant field position.

Would immediately be the second best receiver on the team after Olsen.  Would immediately be the best kick and punt returner on the team.  Would also be the 2nd best RB, and the best receiving option we have ever had out of the backfield...that I can recall.

My only concern would be Shula, or possibly even RR handcuffing Shula to use him correctly.

P.S. I like him much more than Fournette for what we NEED to run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catufb85 said:

No don't take this kid at #8, not because hes not deserving of #8, but because you can trade down into the teens pick up additional picks and still get him in the middle of the 1st.  I would be okay with that scenario.

It still amazes me how many people think its so easy to trade down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

It still amazes me how many people think its so easy to trade down.

It isn't easy but its not impossible.  when you have a top 10 pick and teams want to move up.  Patriots move down more than any other team in the NFL. Twice moved down in a recent draft and worked out well.

plenty of information and trade details showing its rather common for trades in the 1st round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need more dynamic players on offense terribly.  Cam is, but you can't risk him any longer....Olsen is a great catcher, and route runner...but not much after that.  Stew is now a battering ram that can still get outside every now and again, and our WR's are big, tall, OK route runners that struggle with consistency.

 

I'm 100% OK with taking the most versatile weapon for this offense at the 8th spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thefuzz said:

 

We don't need to keep running "our" offense...that's the point.  See the headline in the link below.

 

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8156a532150a4fbca14fc8a3e2b25c2b/rivera-panthers-offense-needs-evolve-behind-qb-newton

 

My point is that Fournette fits perfectly into our physical identity. You can evolve an offense and still keep they physical brand of football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not suggesting that tanking is the right thing to do every time. I do think that if you have guys like Burns and Moore that you will trade anyway, then you should think about tanking and getting max value, especially if you want to grab a QB that might go 1st overall. We tried to do both. Trade CMC for picks but don’t take 3 1sts and a 2nd for Burns and Moore. Instead, we won a few games and then threw in Moore on a trade because we didn’t tank and we gave Burns away for a 2nd. Can you honestly say that fully tanking, by trading away all our best guys who weren’t in future plans, in 2022 wouldn’t have made our team better now? We wanted a rookie QB and we didn’t extend the main guy we didn’t want to trade. We were 100% in full tear down and we could have been a playoff team last year if we used the 4 extra 1sts or 3 1sts and 2 2nds (counting picks saved on Young by being pick 3 or 4 not 9) on D. Culture building is funny. It took three coaching changes to seemingly get there. Morgan and Canales weren’t in charge when we “protected” our culture. We still traded Burns and Moore, we just lost 3 first round picks in the process. Also, do you think the Eagles are in a bad place because of their coach clearly tanking a game for a draft pick? Remember that? It was obvious and the coach was fired. The funny thing is that this is something teams do all the time but they add their stars (like Cam in 2016, CMC, Burns, etc.) to IR or rest them in week 16/17. Pederson was just dumb and made it obvious. He could have just sat his starters to start. Anyway, did that incident tank risk their credibility? Did Barkley decide to not sign with them? Seems like their SB win and other SB visit say they are just fine. Winning makes culture, picking the right coach makes culture, trading away guys who are on other teams in a year for top picks and keeping more picks by having a better starting pick to trade up, does not impact culture. If it helps you win, culture will be fine, ask the Eagles.
×
×
  • Create New...