Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Won't Open Season Against Patriots; Possibility Against Falcons


Saca312

Recommended Posts

I would like the schedule to run something like this 

 

Week 1. Chicago 1 pm

Week 2. New York Jets 1 pm

Week 3. New Orleans Saints 8:30pm

Week 4. Atlanta Falcons 4:15 pm

Week 5. New England 8:30 pm

Week 6 bye

Week 7 Tampa Bay 1 pm

Week 8 Atlanta Falcons 1 pm

Week 9 Buffalo Bills 4 pm

Week 10 Miami Dolphins 1 pm

Week 11 Green Bay Packers 830 pm

Week 12 Detroit Lions 1 pm

Week 13 Tampa Bay 4 pm

Week 14 Philadelphia Eagles 1 pm

Week 15 LA Rams 4:05 pm

Week 16 Minnesota Vikings 1 pm

Week 17 New Orleans Saints 4:15 Pm

 

Granted, I didn't take the time to see which games outside of the division were home and not. So take the ribbing lightly... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Never argued who was more likely to start. I'm arguing that the Cowboys are a competent team anymoreso with that worse defense and a likely tougher schedule this year.

I'm talking ratings. Ratings. Ratings. The NFL will always go with ratings. I have no idea where you went here, help me out. I'm speaking about ratings. Ratings. Do the Panthers match up with the Cowboys with ratings or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...