Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Next Head Coach


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I'm gonna go off topic here but I feel it's necessary to acknowledge Bj-monster for being a new member that actually searched the thread history to make his first post in an old but relevant thread rather than starting a new one. May you lead all other new members with your glorious example-setting technique.

......and with a move like that one might wonder who he really is......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Harbaugh Is a good coach..But i think carolina will want somebody who is in the pro coaching ranks.Who Ever it is i believe they will be a defensive coach...And with people saying who carolina will pick in the draft.It depends on who the coach will be..Bet yo Money.4 example if he is a offensive coach he will go offense and a defensive coach will go defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amuses me that this thread was actually started last year :lol:

Went a long time with no activity before someone bumped it, but then I guess it's a more relevant discussion than ever right now. Might need to update the initial posts at some point.

I wonder what the record is for longest gap between a thread's start date and last post :sosp:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not buy the " no retread has won with 2 teams " stat/saying.

IMO that is useless stat, winning a super bowl means things have to come together just right for the team ( see 07 Giants for the best recent example ), and it just has not happened twice for the same coach yet, does not mean it cannot or will not happen. Just getting to the super bowl is something most head coaches will not experience once, let alone twice. I don't know it just irks me for some reason ( nothing personal Mr.Scot )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amuses me that this thread was actually started last year :lol:

Went a long time with no activity before someone bumped it, but then I guess it's a more relevant discussion than ever right now. Might need to update the initial posts at some point.

I wonder what the record is for longest gap between a thread's start date and last post :sosp:

I read most threads you start because of how insightful they tend to be. So, imagine my surprise when I read the first post - without realizing it's posting date - and saw some things that didn't make a lot of sense in your coaching evals >.> Then I saw the date and it became clear!

A lot of it is still relevant today! I would love to see the first post updated, as I think you have the right idea with the setup, and I'd love to see more of your input on the subject.

I do not buy the " no retread has won with 2 teams " stat/saying.

IMO that is useless stat, winning a super bowl means things have to come together just right for the team ( see 07 Giants for the best recent example ), and it just has not happened twice for the same coach yet, does not mean it cannot or will not happen. Just getting to the super bowl is something most head coaches will not experience once, let alone twice. I don't know it just irks me for some reason ( nothing personal Mr.Scot )

It's primary use in pointing out is that hiring someone who has been there and done that is nowhere near a guarantee of success. Though I have no data to back it up, I also think retreads are often expected to duplicate results in a somewhat unrealistic fashion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

I do not buy the " no retread has won with 2 teams " stat/saying.

IMO that is useless stat, winning a super bowl means things have to come together just right for the team ( see 07 Giants for the best recent example ), and it just has not happened twice for the same coach yet, does not mean it cannot or will not happen. Just getting to the super bowl is something most head coaches will not experience once, let alone twice. I don't know it just irks me for some reason ( nothing personal Mr.Scot )

It's primary use in pointing out is that hiring someone who has been there and done that is nowhere near a guarantee of success. Though I have no data to back it up, I also think retreads are often expected to duplicate results in a somewhat unrealistic fashion.

Link to comment

I know everybody is different, but I think JR got burned with Seifert and will probably not go that way again. I could be wrong. :) Won't be the first time... Seifert was a product of the organization just like Cowher. I really hope they go with new blood, somebody who is hungry and ready to prove he should have been a coach 2 or 3 years ago. Garrett might be a way to go, but will Dallas really let him go?

Shhhesh you're stupid! shut the fug up and post some pictures!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...