Another rumor: 49ers May Go Watson 2nd Overall.

[bandu]

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

  Seriously? I linked from the NFLs own website. About as legitimate a source as one could provide. As far as we can tell, especially from your response, you just made up some numbers with no link, or facts, or anything to back them up. I've asked repeatedly for a link to an article or any keywords that would lead me to this "magical" proof. Yet you claim my facts are nonsense, and your numbers with no backing are valid. Sure. That seems logical. Well done.

you have a link week 1 active roster that doesn't include IR or practice squad making it irrelevant like your topic...lmao at u tumor

on the other hand my magical (correct) numbers are relevant since it includes everyone and most importantly the ENTIRE 2016 NFL season

 

 

[top dawg]

One season. LMFAO

[bandu]

17 minutes ago, top dawg said:

One season. LMFAO

LMFAO at a week one ACTIVE roster right now

[unicar15]

No way the Bears pass on Garrett or trade. 

[Toomers]

4 hours ago, bandu said:

you have a link week 1 active roster that doesn't include IR or practice squad making it irrelevant like your topic...lmao at u tumor

on the other hand my magical (correct) numbers are relevant since it includes everyone and most importantly the ENTIRE 2016 NFL season

 

 

  Since the original statement was about NFL "studs", WTF do practice squad and scrubs signed during the season have to do with the issue at all. Maybe you should try and read with a little comprehension. And once again, where are your numbers from?

   Not to mention that this was about entire conferences, and you listed four teams. My "humor" is simply pointing out your idiocies.

[bandu]

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

  Since the original statement was about NFL "studs", WTF do practice squad and scrubs signed during the season have to do with the issue at all. Maybe you should try and read with a little comprehension. And once again, where are your numbers from?

   Not to mention that this was about entire conferences, and you listed four teams. My "humor" is simply pointing out your idiocies.

you are not the OP nor do you make the rules just because you have flew over a cuckoos nest 

the topici in this particular thread happens to be...49ers might go Watson second overall

[Saca312]

A new rumor is that they like Trubisky as well, which makes a lot more sense.

Browns are really worried they won't get Tribusky at all. They're heavily considering just passing on Garrett to get their coveted QB instead #1 overall. 

Also, reports are that Jacksonville is content with their runningbacks and don't plan on taking one in the first round, but rather other runningbacks in the later rounds. Defended Yeldon and Ivory to the max. They're heavily considering an o-lineman or a d-lineman instead as their most pressing issues.

[Toomers]

19 minutes ago, bandu said:

you are not the OP nor do you make the rules just because you have flew over a cuckoos nest 

the topici in this particular thread happens to be...49ers might go Watson second overall

   No ones making rules. Just asked him and you to post anything to back up your statements. Which you obviously can't. Or you would. And wouldn't have to resort to attempting to attack me instead of backing up your BS theory. It's called being a rational adult. Keep dodging the question. Don't blame you. If I proclaimed my ignorance like you have, I would try to avoid the issue too. 

[bandu]

10 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   No ones making rules. Just asked him and you to post anything to back up your statements. Which you obviously can't. Or you would. And wouldn't have to resort to attempting to attack me instead of backing up your BS theory. It's called being a rational adult. Keep dodging the question. Don't blame you. If I proclaimed my ignorance like you have, I would try to avoid the issue too. 

lol...you can't prove it wrong... just because you can't google isn't my problem

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, bandu said:

lol...you can't prove it wrong 

   I already did. Right away. From a legit source with a provided link. Unlike your "cause I said so" reasoning. You need to stop. This has become like pistol-whipping a blind kid for me and isn't even fun anymore. It's just sad. 

[DelhommesTheMan]

Jaguars are not taking Fournette (most likely taking Allen), the only way he isn't a Panther at 8 is if a team like Cinci or NO jumps us for him since it's not secret we love him.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

[bandu]

Just now, Toomers said:

   I already did. Right away. From a legit source with a provided link. Unlike your "cause I said so" reasoning. You need to stop. This has become like pistol-whipping a blind kid for me and isn't even fun anymore. It's just sad. 

obviously reading comperhension is NOT your forte...week 1 active roster had nothing absolutely to do whatsoever with what i posted...

[top dawg]

7 hours ago, bandu said:

7 hours ago, bandu said:

 

[top dawg]

http://www.ncaa.com/news/football/article/2016-04-28/nfl-draft-colleges-conferences-most-represented-last-10-years

https://www.google.com/amp/www.cleveland.com/articles/19230418/which_colleges_and_conferences.amp

http://www.espn.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/91053/breaking-down-nfl-rosters-by-conferences-and-colleges

http://247sports.com/Article/Since-2005-SEC-dominates-conferences-in-producing-NFL-talent--29686479

I could go on, but really no need. Keep arguing an unsubstantiated point.