Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Whats the saddest non-fiction book you've read?


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Been more in the mood recently to read real human stories, Doesn't have to be sad could be anything that truly moved you.

My choice for something recent I am reading is "Gaddafis Harem". Which I am about half way through now. A reporter is recounting the story of a young girl that was kidnapped by Muammar  Gaddafi and was subjected to years of rape and torture. Honestly doesn't seem real all the stuff this girl had to go through.

2sjfE.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Harm's Way: The Sinking of the USS Indianapolis and the Extraordinary Story of its Survivors.

The ship had just delivered components of the Hiroshima bomb to Tinian and was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine. Due to incompetence on the Navy's part, 900 men were left in the water for nearly 5 days to suffer shark attacks, dehydration, and madness. Only 316 survived.

To add insult to injury, Captain McVay was court martialed for failing to zigzag. Sad chapter in the history of the US Navy. They used McVay as a scapegoat to cover their asses. He committed suicide in 1968.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jaycat said:

In Harm's Way: The Sinking of the USS Indianapolis and the Extraordinary Story of its Survivors.

The ship had just delivered components of the Hiroshima bomb to Tinian and was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine. Due to incompetence on the Navy's part, 900 men were left in the water for nearly 5 days to suffer shark attacks, dehydration, and madness. Only 316 survived.

To add insult to injury, Captain McVay was court martialed for failing to zigzag. Sad chapter in the history of the US Navy. They used McVay as a scapegoat to cover their asses. He committed suicide in 1968.

great book. seeing those PBYs buzzing overhead for days had to be incomprehensibly catastrophic to morale. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51xE0QMfmlL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

For those of you who never got this lesson in your high school history classes, the United States rounded up thousands of Japanese-Americans and put them into prison camps, although they were called internment camps or relocation camps. The vast majority of them were American citizens who owned businesses and were an integral part of the community. But they were Japanese and after Pearl Harbor, it was good enough reason for some....

Sound familiar?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is historical fiction, I suppose.  Johnny Got His Gun by Dalton Trumbo. Though it is fiction and set in WWI, this story, no-doubt, has played out countless times throughout history. I think the character was even based on the story of a real soldier. This book touched me particularly deeply because around the time I first read it, my wife's friend's husband was injured in an IED explosion.  At the time, he was the most severely injured member of our military to not die. His injuries were very similar to the ones the soldier has in the book. It was as if I was reading a first hand-account of what he was living through and thinking.

This book was powerful enough that they quit publishing it during WWII. I recommend it to everyone.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...