Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Safety and DT away from having a really good D


wes19d

Recommended Posts

Anyone else think this. If we had a Bob Sanders type safety and a good DT that could penetrate I think our defense would be really solid. I think our corners would really shine if we had help over the top so they could play more aggressively. We are solid at DE and LB. I really wish they would give Martin a shot at safety, couldnt get any worse that Godfrey and we could actually use our second round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else think this. If we had a Bob Sanders type safety and a good DT that could penetrate I think our defense would be really solid. I think our corners would really shine if we had help over the top so they could play more aggressively. We are solid at DE and LB. I really wish they would give Martin a shot at safety, couldnt get any worse that Godfrey and we could actually use our second round pick.

LMAO! We're solid at DE? Peppers is a pussy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you say but with some D line penetration Peppers would have more success pass rushing. Don't forget how everybody was so happy with him after week one when he blocked the FG and got the sack. Worth the money: no Still a quality pass rusher who has had some bad games: yes. Lets not turn this into a Peppers hate thread. A lot is to be said about our coaching in the next few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I agree with the original post. People seem to keep forgetting that they're running a new scheme. As a unit, they are slowly but surely getting better IMO. They definitely need a DT that can consistently hold the point in run defense, and get penetration in pass defense.

And Godfrey is the worst tackler on this team, IMO. Fix that position, and it will make a big difference.

There is nothing anybody can do about Peppers except to hope that he gets his ass in gear, but it would help tremendously if the QB didn't always have room to step up when Peppers does beat his man to the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they looked pretty good in the last game, even with the deficiencies in mind.

As for the D-line... they looked "so close, yet so far." They did quite well many times when rushing the QB. As for stopping the run though... sometimes it just looked downright nasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong, but we get run on more around the edge, and little dump offs to the running backs if I remember correctly. Sure there were those up the gut, but I seem to remember getting gashed around the edges more in the Dallas game. Will have to go back and look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong, but we get run on more around the edge, and little dump offs to the running backs if I remember correctly. Sure there were those up the gut, but I seem to remember getting gashed around the edges more in the Dallas game. Will have to go back and look.

That's what I saw too; you're not alone.

They just didn't attempt enough runs at the right times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...