Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Safety and DT away from having a really good D


wes19d

Recommended Posts

Anyone else think this. If we had a Bob Sanders type safety and a good DT that could penetrate I think our defense would be really solid. I think our corners would really shine if we had help over the top so they could play more aggressively. We are solid at DE and LB. I really wish they would give Martin a shot at safety, couldnt get any worse that Godfrey and we could actually use our second round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else think this. If we had a Bob Sanders type safety and a good DT that could penetrate I think our defense would be really solid. I think our corners would really shine if we had help over the top so they could play more aggressively. We are solid at DE and LB. I really wish they would give Martin a shot at safety, couldnt get any worse that Godfrey and we could actually use our second round pick.

LMAO! We're solid at DE? Peppers is a pussy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you say but with some D line penetration Peppers would have more success pass rushing. Don't forget how everybody was so happy with him after week one when he blocked the FG and got the sack. Worth the money: no Still a quality pass rusher who has had some bad games: yes. Lets not turn this into a Peppers hate thread. A lot is to be said about our coaching in the next few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I agree with the original post. People seem to keep forgetting that they're running a new scheme. As a unit, they are slowly but surely getting better IMO. They definitely need a DT that can consistently hold the point in run defense, and get penetration in pass defense.

And Godfrey is the worst tackler on this team, IMO. Fix that position, and it will make a big difference.

There is nothing anybody can do about Peppers except to hope that he gets his ass in gear, but it would help tremendously if the QB didn't always have room to step up when Peppers does beat his man to the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they looked pretty good in the last game, even with the deficiencies in mind.

As for the D-line... they looked "so close, yet so far." They did quite well many times when rushing the QB. As for stopping the run though... sometimes it just looked downright nasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong, but we get run on more around the edge, and little dump offs to the running backs if I remember correctly. Sure there were those up the gut, but I seem to remember getting gashed around the edges more in the Dallas game. Will have to go back and look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong, but we get run on more around the edge, and little dump offs to the running backs if I remember correctly. Sure there were those up the gut, but I seem to remember getting gashed around the edges more in the Dallas game. Will have to go back and look.

That's what I saw too; you're not alone.

They just didn't attempt enough runs at the right times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...