Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could we "double dip" again?


CatfanMO

Recommended Posts

I'd suggest going DE, if there is one available in the 2nd or 3rd rounds. If Kareem Hunt from Toledo is available in the 4th go after him. He is a similar mold to Stew and would allow us to maintain that type of runner if something were to happen and Stewart has to miss time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

If we double dip it will be to replace Stewart.  Samaje Perine is the guy. Definitely in the third round.  I'd love that. 

Samaje or Kareem Hunt would be ideal. We carry three running backs on game day anyway and McCaffrey, Perine, and Stewart would be a formidable group of guys to have back there with Cam. Not to mention two back sets where you can send Calf back out into the formation or bring him in from the formation after you get the defense into a nickel look. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I pied you because I thought you were shaking your head because of the two players that he chose, not because you think it's impossible that G-man might double dip.

If there's one thing I've learned about G-man, anything is possible. He never fails to do something surprising.

  It was about the two players named. 

What Im saying is that it's sad that we just took a RB top 10 and still need another one for the future as well. That shouldn't have to happen with someone worth that draft pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  It was about the two players named. 

What Im saying is that it's sad that we just took a RB top 10 and still need another one for the future as well. That shouldn't have to happen with someone worth that draft pick. 

It has nothing to do with CMC being worth the pick because he's a completely different kind of player than those other guys. I promise you they are not going to slam him into the middle of the line 30 times a game when he is so damn good at other things. Stewart will still be the conventional workhorse RB for at least this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 15 said:

fixed. 

I actually agree with that more.. You just spent the a top 10 pick on a RB and ppl want another 1??? Doesn't that mean you made a mistake with the 1st pick??

And before you talk about "well we double dip with Starr and KK" look up the word context.. We literally had no DT on the team when we did that same with CB last year.. Different situation with the RB position..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said the conservative play calling was because Canales doesn't think we can win shootouts. Yes, I did say part of that was because of the young, inexperienced receivers and that the OL is better suited for run blocking. I should have also included Young as part of the reason as well but I was responding to the post concerning "young receivers" and Thielens' absence. I am not so enamored with Young that I think all his problems are simply because of the receivers. I do think they overpaid for him and he has not lived up to the cost. He has had his struggles, as does pretty much every rookie qb thrown into a bad situation. But I have seen enough good things to have hope that he continues to get better. The OP is just pointing out how his performance late in the games when the game is on the line is one of those good things.  
    • I think it goes both ways  It could be they are used to pocket passers, not someone who constantly has to create throwing zones for himself with pocket movement  point being, whether it is Young or the receivers or the sun or the moon or the wind, can’t win in the nfl without the threat of a downfield attack
×
×
  • Create New...