Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gil Brandt: Five best offseasons of 2017

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted

3) Carolina Panthers

The Panthers finished at the bottom of the NFC South with a 6-10 record -- but they also lost six games by three points or fewer, meaning there wasn't that much separating them from contention. Cam Newton's cast of pass catchers was lacking in 2016, but the Panthers' first two draft picks (the ultra-versatile Christian McCaffrey and the sure-handed Curtis Samuel) both project as matchup nightmares who can provide some serious juice to this aerial attack. I'm not worried about Newton's surgically-repaired shoulder, but I am extremely high on McCaffrey and Samuel, and I'm confident the rookies will help Carolina's QB return to his MVP form after a down season.

I liked what Carolina did in bringing back defensive end Julius Peppers and cornerback Captain Munnerlyn. They might be late in their careers, but I think it made sense in terms of fit and locker-room impact. Peppers is only one year removed from a 10.5-sack season, while Munnerlyn can provide guidance to the youngsters in the secondary. This defense plays pretty well, and adding pass rusher Daeshon Hall in the third round will only help. Locking up Kawann Short was huge. Adding veteran Matt Kalil and rookie Taylor Moton will boost the offensive line. Ultimately, McCaffrey and Samuel are the keys, and I think they have Newton and the Panthers primed for a turnaround.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Just imagine if DG did his job last season. We'd be a power house.

We definitely wouldn't have Daeshon Hall.  We probably wouldn't have Short after this year.  VERY unlikely McCaffrey is a Panther.  And, maybe, the Falcons wouldn't have been able to blow a 25 point lead.  It was worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nails said:

We definitely wouldn't have Daeshon Hall.  We probably wouldn't have Short after this year.  VERY unlikely McCaffrey is a Panther.  And, maybe, the Falcons wouldn't have been able to blow a 25 point lead.  It was worth it.

Yup gotta think of the butterfly affect essentially. You can change one small thing and that could totally change a bunch of different outcomes of the future. 

Maybe keeping norman would have let us win a few more games, but if we had the same injuries occur our record probably still would have been mediocre. Our 2016 draft would have been totally different and 2017 draft also. 

The one thing you can say is its highly unlikely we get McCaffrey if we kept norman . So alot is hinging on how well our 2nd year CBs do, if Butler has any impact this season, and if McCaffrey/Samuel can electrify the offense. If all these things work and we have a deep playoff run, losing norman was worth it . If we spirial into mediocrity again for the 2ndstrait season? The conspiracy theroists will be everywhere haha. That and a bunch of coaches should be fired if we miss the playoffs 2 strait years after going to a super bowl 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I recall multiple media people criticizing the Panthers for their offseason, prior to the draft.

They killed DG for spending so much on Matt Kalil

that'll still be a pretty valid criticism if Kalil is as bad as his most recent years with the Vikings. There's a hell of alot riding on him , Oher's health, and Moton's potential to effectively play on either side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I recall multiple media people criticizing the Panthers for their offseason, prior to the draft.

They killed DG for spending so much on Matt Kalil

Actually, once the details came out, it's a VERY team-friendly deal that won't cost us much to cut the rope after 2 years. Not as bad of a contract like everyone originally assumed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

that'll still be a pretty valid criticism if Kalil is as bad as his most recent years with the Vikings. There's a hell of alot riding on him , Oher's health, and Moton's potential to effectively play on either side. 

indeed. Gman gambled and won big with Oher a few years ago. He's gambling once again and needs Kalil to, at the very least, stay healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bandu
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By bandu · Posted

      if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...