Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns hire Ryan Grigson


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Because of course they did.

("Senior Personnel Executive" per PFT)

Ryan brings valuable experience to our personnel group,” Browns G.M. Sashi Brown said in a statement. “He was raised as a road-scout and has been evaluating talent in this league for almost 20 years. We place a premium on that experience and on his passion for football. Ryan has much to offer to any personnel department and we are pleased that he chose to join our staff.”

Left unsaid: "He also once gave us a first round pick for Trent Richardson."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is actually a decent move. Grigson has been consistently good at identifying talent at WR and TE. If used right, he can be an asset.

I like what the Browns are doing. They need to stay the course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ken said:

This is actually a decent move. Grigson has been consistently good at identifying talent at WR and TE. If used right, he can be an asset.

I like what the Browns are doing. They need to stay the course.

as long as the give HJ a fair opportunity, i think they can turn things around but they seem to be trigger happy on their coaches. of course, they can just be destined as an organization to be junk kinda like we are destined to never have back to back winning seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Peppers90 NC said:

as long as the give HJ a fair opportunity, i think they can turn things around but they seem to be trigger happy on their coaches. of course, they can just be destined as an organization to be junk kinda like we are destined to never have back to back winning seasons.

Yeah, I think him not getting fired was a good sign.

Things are looking up for them IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ken said:

Yeah, I think him not getting fired was a good sign.

Things are looking up for them IMO.

it make take another couple years when BR retires and the Bengals will Bengal they could take over that division. but in Steelers fashion, they will probably somehow land another good QB so they dont take that dip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Obviously it's the Browns in 1st place in worst run NFL franchises...but what are the top 5?

Depends on two things. 1. The criteria and 2. Current or all time (franchise history).

For 'running an organization' I'd consider two man things. First of of W/L ratio. It doesn't get any clear cut than that to me. If you're not a well run team you won't win games, period. A winning team brings fans, money, security, fame, respect....so many things. It should be the basis of success.

Second, when things aren't going well (again based mainly on W/L), what is the reason, how long is it allowed to persist, what is done about it, and how quickly are things turned around?

Currently I'd say:

1. Browns

2. Jags

3. Bears

4. 49ers

5. Bills

Runner ups: Raiders, Dolphins, Jets

All time:

1. Browns

2. Lions

3. Texans

4. Bills (mainly for holding the record for longest without a post season game)

5. Jags (almost identical franchise history to the Panthers except the 2015 SB run).

 

Runner ups: Panthers would be around 6/7 alltime with above criteria, W/L record alone in the NFL since 1995 would put them in the bottom 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So... what metrics for production do you believe display these issues/limitations best? Are we only using total passing yards, height, and weight thresholds? If so, then what are those thresholds?
    • I mean as far as his size goes it's all over his tape bouncing up and down on his toes in and around the pocket trying to see the field and defenses know this as well as we do but if folks here want to live in never never land and pretend it's not a thing that's their prerogative. Even our head coach has made it a key focal point to get his footwork under control. But it's still something Bryce is going to be tested on early and often no matter how many keystrokes anyone here commits to the narrative it isn't an issue.
    • It speaks volumes that when asked to define a clear performance threshold the responses instead fixate on Bryce's size. It reinforces what’s been clear for a while now... that for some, it has never been nor will it ever be about production. Any struggles will always be chalked up to his frame, and any strong play will be downplayed or disqualified via highly mobile goalposts.
×
×
  • Create New...