Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking WR Corps by team


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Nate Davis USA Today

1.Giants

2.Packers

3.Patriots

4.Falcons

5.Steelers

17.Panthers

 

Olsen our only sure thing. Benjamin and Fun still uncertain production. Two rookies unknown, but looking good. I think they have us about right....middle of pack. What does the huddle think...to high, to low, or about right?

 

 

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now that is fair. By the end of the season I think our wide receiver group could be in the top 10 if the offensive line comes together and Cam does his best 2017 imitation of his MVP performance in 2015 and takes what defenses are giving him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ill tell you right now... any fool can look into the past and tell you what was. 

 

 

looking into the future intuitivly our WR is going to be the poo

 

 

 

and funchess isnt a bum. hes going to break out. watch.  

 

i run all over you past dwelling general fools in fantasy football.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Huddler said:

quit projecting your own bumness onto others

i don't follow. this is a forum for opinions and viewpoints for our team. i think funchess is a bum. it is my opinion. take your bullshit liberal opinion suppression back to the TB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dex said:

i don't follow. this is a forum for opinions and viewpoints for our team. i think funchess is a bum. it is my opinion. take your bullshit liberal opinion suppression back to the TB.

1) im kidding. as your right to say your opinion I can say mine!

2) wana join my FFleague?

3) you think im liberal? thats hilarious. I voted for Trump my man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

1) im kidding. as your right to say your opinion I can say mine! i don't follow your opinion of me being a bum but okay

2) wana join my FFleague? no

3) you think im liberal? thats hilarious. I voted for Trump my man! good for you

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Dex    just curious what makes you think im liberal? cause im not picking one side and choosing to believe everything im told to and to think for myself being about right in the middle... facepalming at retards pointing the finger at the other side projecting their own bullshit ontp the other getting absolutly no progress done with the complete unwillingness to give and take and come to legitimate fair tradeoffs?

 

rant aside, where do you think im liberal from? my bob dylan love? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...