Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyrie/ Shumpert for Kemba/ MKG ?

TheWiz

By TheWiz,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

Russell Westbrook avg 5.4 turnovers a game. Dude is most overrated player ever

chuck, cmon hommie - he also average a fuggin tripple double for the season..

but TBH - i dont even really count Russ as a PG in the NBA.. but if I include him - my top 10 PGs right now are:

Steph
Russ
CP3 (trending down though)
Wall
Lillard
Kyrie
Kemba
Lowry
Isaiah
Conley

Link to comment
Share on other sites
djp14 Rising Star

djp14

Posted
Posted

This is what Rick Bonnell had to say:

Quote

"The problem is whether the Hornets have the assets the Cavs would accept for Irving, a four-time All-Star. Obviously, Walker would have to be in the offer. After that, if I were the Cavaliers, I’d ask for Cody Zeller and rookie Malik Monk, plus multiple first-round picks, and expect the Hornets to take back a bad contract."

F**k that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

Imo, Kyrie is the best and most dangerous PG in the NBA right now. 

Id would do that trade in a heart beat. But LMFAO. That would be robbing the Cavs and I dont see it happening. 

Would have to send prob Frank and a 1st along with Kemba and MKG to even start a conversation. Thats probably just people blowing smoke. 

Cavs would do it if Richard Jefferson was included instead of Shump.  In my opinion, at least.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherphan96 Newbie

pantherphan96

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Meh, I think Kyrie is better than Wall.  But, the other two.  Yep, I agree.  

I would agree Kyrie has the better handle and is the better finisher but Wall is a better defender and just as athletic. I wouldn't mind having either on my team but personally I'd choose Wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

Wall is a better all around player. Kyrie is more dangerous. 

 

wat_gif_by_ryla_sehn.gif

So what are you saying? Wall is better but Kyrie is a better scorer?

Wall - 23ppg - 11apg - 4rpg
Kyrie - 25ppg - 6apg - 3rpg

Because I think we all agree with that statement.. But then you still say Kyire is the best PG

How..?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

Kyrie is a better passer no doubt about it.

 

but he's averaging 23 ppg, why? Who else is on the team? Beal and thats it. Same crap for Russ. One man team for Russ. Nothing but stats. 

Kyrie has LBJ, Love and JR. 

I look like a fool...? you just said Kyrie was a better passer and Wall averages 5 more ast than he does..

Steph, CP3, Russ, Wall and Lillard all have been the #1 guy on their PLAYOFF teams.. You say Russ is nuthin but stats - that's all Kyire was before LeBron got there.. But Russ actuallygot them in the Playoffs - IN THE WEST.. Kyrie cudn't even get there in the East.. with all his heavenly ability - they won the lottery like 8 years in a row, lol..

here:
swap Kyrie for Steph = are the Warriors better or worse.. easily worse because the ball would be cloggedup by Kyrie when they are a ball-movement team..

swap Kyrie for CP3 = are the Clippers any better.. no friggin way..

swap Kyrie for Russ = get the fug outta here if you think he is leading that squad to the playoffs..

swap Kyrie for Wall = close call if they are better or worse - but I say worse cus Kyrie lack of D..

swap Kyrie for Lillard = I think it is a wash in this case.. but I give Lillard the because he has proven to be able to get his team over the hump being the #1 guy.. everyone thought they'd be a bottom dweller when Aldridge went to SA.. but there they were in the playoffs.. even the 8th seed in the West is respectable..

So please drop the Kyrie is the "most dangerous" player in the world.. I don't even know what that means.. Imma say Matt Barnes is WAY more dangerous that Kyrie, lmao.. even Z-bo at his age is more "dangerous"..

DGDO_MystikalDanger.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

Meant to say Wall was a better passer. My bad on that part. 

But yea your credibility is done and over with hoe

 

gsw would be the freakin Dream Team with Irving. Curry is no much better a passer than Irving. Or a better defender. Curry is nothing but a 3 point artist. Irving makes Curry is bit(h every time.

When you massively fug up, but then claim other guy has no cred..

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

been waiting for someone to post the "lets trade for kyrie' thread

 

first off- kyrie would 100% leave after two years 

Second, Kyrie is very overrated. He's an incredible scorer and can create his own shot. He's dazzling, has all the talent in the world, but he's an awful defender and he has a bad basketball IQ. 

If we got him for Kemba and MKG I would do it, but that's an unrealistic trade imo and there is 0% I'd give up Monk for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherphan96 Newbie

pantherphan96

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

gsw would be the freakin Dream Team with Irving. Curry is no much better a passer than Irving. Or a better defender. Curry is nothing but a 3 point artist. Irving makes Curry is bit(h every time.

GS is successful because they rely on ball movement and unselfish play. Kyrie can't handle sharing the ball 50/50 with Lebron, probably the best superstar teammate in terms of unselfishness and making plays for his teammates. GS would be much worse with Kyrie's ISO-ball game versus Curry's quick trigger 3s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • amcoolio
      Greg Cosell: Bryce Young is a complimentary piece

      By amcoolio · Posted

      I hope not. 3rd-5th round QB's are historically awful. Most of the time that team is just drafting another QB in the first the following year. Look at the Saints, if they continue to suck this year they are just taking a QB. And if they do they just threw away a 2nd round pick that they just drafted. We did the same poo with Clausen, Greer, Pike, that guy we drafted a few years ago who is so irrelevant I forgot his name...  Just take a 1st round QB if Bryce isn't the answer and be prepared to live with it
    • NorthTryon
      New Helmet Movement

      By NorthTryon · Posted

      This reminds me on Madden where you create an alternate uniform and the pre-recorded voice overs talk about how hideous your uniform looks. 🤣
    • amcoolio
      Trade for a QB?

      By amcoolio · Posted

      There are people on this forum that just want to see a lot of passing yards....number go up. That's all it is, really. They are thirsting for a 350-400 yard game. The idea that Jameis Winston is going to come in and play like a star and lead us to wins is ludacris. He's the 3rd fuging string for a 2-5 team and has played horrible for years now. Sure, passing numbers will go up but you'll also get a lot of dumb plays, pick 6's, and incompletions en route to a frustrating bad offensive performance, just in a different way. I think these people are yearning for another Delhomme situation, and the odds of that happening are very very slim. It's way more likely Howell or Jameis comes in and looks like Jack Plummer or Andy Dalton did in the preseason. There just isn't that much good quarterbacking in this league right now. And if we draft another QB in the first round, there is a good chance they bust. It's not a guaranteed carrot. The reality is, as mediocre as Bryce has been, the risk of bringing someone else in in-season and releasing Bryce becuase you aren't happy with his current performance is staggeringly high. Don't want to re-up his contract and search for a solution in the offseason? Sure, I'm on board. Bryce hasn't been good enough to warrant a second contract. But It is very. very unlikely that bringing someone else in midseason is going to give this team more wins.
×
×
  • Create New...