Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Better rookie season for Christian McCaffrey or Leonard Fournette?


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Dude, it's more than inconsistent. If he weren't such a fumbler and had more vision, he easily would have been a first round pick. He's very similar to Jamaal Charles. In space, the guy is a killer but outside that... awful decision making.

Review my statement. I said White made the bigger impact - he did. Bush had an injury plagued career. Yes, he had more all purpose yards but he wasn't featured consistently and watched from the sidelines as New Orleans won a Superbowl.

I'm not gonna keep going back and forth about Kamara lol. My Kamara>CMC post was trolling anyway. I'm very high om what he can do in this offense, given his skillset, however. 

Repeating your statement doesn't make it less outlandish. How does one impact a game other than yards and TDs? For being bigger and stronger, White didn't even have a better YPC. He had 2 decent seasons. That's it. Reggie more than doubled his TDs. Reggie was instrumental in winning our SB. He destroyed the Cardinals and had 325 yards from scrimmage and 3 TDs during the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎8‎/‎23‎/‎2017 at 8:49 AM, KaseKlosed said:

CMC will probably avg 65 yards rushing and 40 yards receiving. He will not win rookie of the year. He probably won't even make a single probowl in his career. He is not better than reggie bush and has lower ceiling than Bush talent wise.  

I think the team would be happy with those numbers.

To put it in perspective Marshall Faulk averaged 70 and 40 for his career.

http://www.nfl.com/player/marshallfaulk/2500601/careerstats

With that being said Fournette might end up as the better traditional running back but he was actually drafted 4th and we picked 8th.  Throughout the draft process people on this board were focused on Fournette vs Adams vs Thomas and some of were convinced that our pick would come from the next tier of players.  

If you want to compare CMC to the other options we really had you would be better off looking at players such as Cook, Ross, or Howard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you're soely looking at rushing stats and Stewart stays healthy and somewhat productive for most of the year , then maybe Fournette. But if your taking total yards gained then it'll be McCaffrey be a mile assuming he gets decent playing time and Cam actually uses him as a the primary check down option he could end up racking up quite a lot of receiving yards. And we already saw from the last game McCaffrey is just deadly with screens or any scheme that has downfield blocking . 

In the best situation for the team though, McCaffrey may have somewhat decent stats (maybe about 500 rush, 500 receiving, 300 total PR/KR) , but he will take so much attention from he defense either Kelvin or Olsen will be the one that actually ends up having the monster season.  My money's going on Kelvin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2017 at 8:49 AM, KaseKlosed said:

CMC will probably avg 65 yards rushing and 40 yards receiving. He will not win rookie of the year. He probably won't even make a single probowl in his career. He is not better than reggie bush and has lower ceiling than Bush talent wise.  

If those are his averages, I wont be pissed. 

 

Thats 1680 yards per season. Also throw in his break away touchdowns, say 10-12 a year. 

Pretty nasty numbers, imho.

Also you are basing your projections on him not being an every down back, which I believe he can be. I bet he forces you to eat poo, and admit he is nasty.

** get pooped on. **

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...