Cover 1: Kevon Seymour Analysis Article

[MHS831]

On 9/2/2017 at 7:01 PM, Seamus the Dog said:

Everything I have read says this guy is a Zone corner.  I'm not sure what you've been reading.

 

Hell no.  Cover corner all the way.

[Saca312]

On 9/3/2017 at 2:11 PM, Zithers said:

My analysis: The Panthers just traded for a dude who lost the nickel job to Leonard Johnson, a guy we valued so much that we didn't re-sign him.

You clearly don't understand scheme fits. McDermott comes in and implements his scheme over Rex's, and Seymour isn't a fit at all.

[La Pantera]

Quote

CB Kevon Seymour says because he was familiar with Sean McDermott's system in Buffalo, he already feels like he's picked things up here.

 

[Snake]

On 9/2/2017 at 7:13 PM, Mr. Scot said:

Darrelle Revis, Assante Samuel, Nnamdi Ashomugah and others have suffered poor seasons or outright downfalls by going to teams with poor scheme fits for their talents.

Better hope our scheme under Wilks is different enough from McDermott to work for this guy.

Let's hope it's not too different it effects Bradberry. 

[Zithers]

6 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

True, but we're not looking for a nickel, we're looking for a guy that can play outside so that Captain doesn't have to come outside if something happens to Worley or Bradberry.

Seymour's arms are nearly 3 inches shorter than Worley's and Bradberry's. Dude doesn't seem to fit our profile of lengthy outside corners. His measureables are much closer to Elder and Sanchez, guys who we tested in the nickel... so I'm really not sure that's what the angle is, unless Hurney/a coach said otherwise when asked about it.

 

6 hours ago, Saca312 said:

You clearly don't understand scheme fits. McDermott comes in and implements his scheme over Rex's, and Seymour isn't a fit at all.

... then why would we trade for him when Rivera/Wilks and McDermott share similar schemes?

Look, we dumped a 6th wideout no one had heard of before a couple months ago and a 7th rounder for this guy. Don't get your hopes up.

[shaqattaq]

13 hours ago, Zithers said:

Seymour's arms are nearly 3 inches shorter than Worley's and Bradberry's. Dude doesn't seem to fit our profile of lengthy outside corners. His measureables are much closer to Elder and Sanchez, guys who we tested in the nickel... so I'm really not sure that's what the angle is, unless Hurney/a coach said otherwise when asked about it.

 

... then why would we trade for him when Rivera/Wilks and McDermott share similar schemes?

Look, we dumped a 6th wideout no one had heard of before a couple months ago and a 7th rounder for this guy. Don't get your hopes up.

I'm definitely not getting my hopes up. And I realize that he is smaller than G-man liked for CB's.  But, and I say this with all sincerity, I died a little inside every time Teddy Williams didn't get cut. At least Seymour's a young guy with room to improve.

[Catufb85]

more i look up this guy and view highlights could be a good piece to the puzzle.  Good depth for now, but definitely like what I'm seeing.