Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

San Francisco - who's headed out?


RoaringRiot

Recommended Posts

Aiiiight Huddlers and Huddle lurkers....who all is headed to the game this weekend? What are your plans and where are you sitting? 

Here's our info for anyone who wants to link up

Friday: Group is meeting up at 7p and then going out on the town (this is the night I get really hammered)

Saturday: Welcoming Party at the Golden Gate Tap Room at 4p. Everyone is welcome. @Montsta better show up and talk to people this time. Don't worry we will blur out his face in all the pics. 

Sunday: We're tailgating at the Red Zone Rally. It's $75 but it's open bar (beer and wine), food, entertainment, and all the early games. Since we're staying in SF, don't have any cars, and there isn't anything else good near the stadium we're taking over their party. We'll have over 25% of the people in attendance in black and blue - so that should be interesting. Plus we get to ride the rollercoasters and @*FreeFua* already told me he will puke if he rides it, so I plan on live streaming that. 

We're sitting in section 231. There are close to 200 in that section. We'll be loud. Hopefully no one gets shived. 

Go Panthers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Joe the Show said:

I really hope the entire roaring riot crowd runs into A-bomb from that terrible smack video.  I want a live stream of him attempting to form full sentences while insults rain upon him.

He won't be there because he's gotta watch the bowling alley for Dead Jerry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jfo89 said:

I live in San Francisco and I'll be at the game in section 110. Don't f*** with dudes from Richmond city and you'll have no worries about getting shived... Probably.

lol Richmond. 

If you are visiting the bay for a game, stay in the city, hang out in the city on the weekend and drive down 101 for the game itself. Stay away from the east bay alltogether. 

This is from a lifelong east bay cat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Paging @h0llywood

You going to try and make it out Friday or Saturday?

I'm flying in tonight after work so I'll be there around 7-8 ish with the family. Going to do the touristy thing with the wife and kids Saturday morning then plan on hanging out at the Golden Gate Tap Room with the rest of you guys. Gonna be an epic weekend and it won't be -15 degrees like the last time we linked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@PanthaSan is going to be there too.

Between the Roaring Riot, Angel City Riot and Cali Cat Pack, could be as much as 300-400 traveling for the game that I know of. 

@*FreeFua* - with the Dodgers on an epic downward spiral, i'm going to take this opportunity to spit on the Giants stadium to get some mojo going again. 

If any other huddlers show their faces, introduce yourself to me and I will buy you a drink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got this alert regarding traffic:

Quote

 

"Please note important information below for both local city and hotel operations:

 Please be aware that due to the event, Tasman Drive will be closed beginning September 10th at 1 am through the conclusion of the event, approximately 5 pm.

Heavy traffic and delays WILL OCCUR on major thoroughfares leading to and from the stadium and surrounding areas, including Highways 101, 237, 880, Lawrence Expressway, Great America Parkway and San Tomas Expressway, as a result of the event. 

Expect heavily increased traffic to begin around 
10 am and at the conclusion of the event, estimated at 4:30 pm."


 

We were there for the SB and it took almost 2 hours to get to Santa Clara from AT&T Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...