Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we want Atlanta and Tampa Bay in the playoffs?


Wanderlai

Recommended Posts

Just curious to see if the we want to see the Birds and Bucs in the playoffs or would we rather see other teams in. I'm torn between pulling for those teams and making the NFC South the better division or sticking with disliking those 2 teams. Now that I think about it, I'd much rather have Atl/TB in before the Cowboys or Eagles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can play them at home, then it doesn't matter. I think with home-field we can beat any team in the NFL. That said, the Falcons worry me the most, as they seem like a team that thinks it's better than it is, and those teams can sometimes get hot in the playoffs and end up in the SB. I hate the Eagles, but would love to see the Panthers destroy them in Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this either is a family-friendly forum or its not, they need to make up their mind. now i get the joys of explaining to my 4 year old niece the wonders of photoshop and that there really isn't a man who can stick his own head up his ass. man, i'm so glad they censor the word f*ck though... else people might feel exposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this either is a family-friendly forum or its not, they need to make up their mind. now i get the joys of explaining to my 4 year old niece the wonders of photoshop and that there really isn't a man who can stick his own head up his ass. man, i'm so glad they censor the word f*ck though... else people might feel exposed.

Just do like I do. In UserCp click the button that says not to display avatars or images

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't stand the other teams in the NFC South, however...I'm hoping they both lose today, and then win next week and get in as the 5 and 6 seeds. Keep Dallas and Philly at home, and give the NFC South a little credibility.

if that's the case, you want atlanta to win out.

if the falcons lose a game and dallas beats the eagles, dallas gets in as a wildcard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...