Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How The Panthers Still Use The 3x1 To Create Near Impossible-To-Cover Mismatches


Saca312

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Whether fans will admit it or not, our offensive scheme which has been evolving every year under Shula, is the most successful scheme in franchise history. 

And fans can't wait to show Shula the door.

Half the time people blame Shula it's an execution issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cat said:

Half the time people blame Shula it's an execution issue.

I know this. You know this, but it doesn't mattwe to thw masses. 

When the offense works, it's vecause Cam is such an amazing talent. When it doesn't, it's Shula's fault. 

Typical, hypocritical bullshit. 

Cam has a lot of control over this offense, and regardless what is called, and who is out on the field, the players must execute. Whether they are starters or not, it's their job. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I know this. You know this, but it doesn't mattwe to thw masses. 

When the offense works, it's vecause Cam is such an amazing talent. When it doesn't, it's Shula's fault. 

Typical, hypocritical bullshit. 

Cam has a lot of control over this offense, and regardless what is called, and who is out on the field, the players must execute. Whether they are starters or not, it's their job. 

 

It's called group think. One person starts something and the rest pile on just to be a part of the group. There is really not a lot of thinking involved though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, panthers55 said:

And is largely dependent on Cam reading the defense and adjusting the play. He has a basic formation where we can run several variations including runs or passes. Cam reads the safeties and decides if they are in zone or man or some variation and calls the play accordingly. He and Shula work in tandem to make things work. It is both working together which is why it slays me when people praise one and castigate the other as if they aren't totally dependent on each other.

That only for some plays...It is not so much as to play design but play calling and personel that is out there on the field.. i agree that funchess and benji should not be on the field together witout a speedster that some pointed out in another thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Darvinsun said:

That only for some plays...It is not so much as to play design but play calling and personel that is out there on the field.. i agree that funchess and benji should not be on the field together witout a speedster that some pointed out in another thread.

Shula doesn't manage the personnel grouping the position coaches do and sometimes they have certain personnel who come in for certain plays. Playcalling and adjustments are shared by Shula and Cam. The offense as I understand it has run and pass options from every formation. The play is called based on down and distance and Cam makes adjustments and where the ball is going based on the defense and where he sees the mismatches. Let's see what happens against a decent defense who knows us well. We can see how evolved this offense is. I hope it is fantastically successful. Don't you? There will be plenty of time to play critic in March. I am along for the ride. I don't care how we do it, I want us to win. This is the first home game and the realistic guys are already complaining.  Predictable, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2017 at 12:00 AM, pantherclaw said:

Whether fans will admit it or not, our offensive scheme which has been evolving every year under Shula, is the most successful scheme in franchise history. 

And fans can't wait to show Shula the door.

Yeah but did he bteak out the fumblerooski like the owner of the original mattress company did? Didny thunk so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
    • a) That they made it a point in the room to point at the paper and say, "hope the camera got that" suggests we really did target the players we wanted and got them. While there is a ton of editing happening to cut out conversations not related to the players we picked, there didn't seem to be a lot of panic about who/what was going on b) Tepper appreciates the analytics. Now that he has a few years to see how the front office team works together to do the analysis, it still looks like he's hands-off (he's learned his lesson??). He seemed less vocal than in previous years' Blueprints (at least, in the edit).  I wouldn't expect Canales to be overly vocal in the draft room - he's likely already made his opinions known behind the scenes about certain players. Draft day is Morgan and Tilis and Eager's day. Loved seeing their interactions/conversations  c) that's all Eager. There's a great piece somewhere about the analytics engine he built floating around somewhere (maybe it was just after the draft?), and how he's constantly tweaking it with info about the players and input from the coaching staff.  That the post-draft press - for the most part - all seem to be overly positive about the draft actions we had compared to other teams makes it seem like we've gotten the ship moving in the right direction. Whether it translates to on-field results, well, that's a different topic for hundreds of other threads
×
×
  • Create New...