Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Those goal line runs...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

A quick look at those failed goal line runs by Stewart. 

 

1) This is an obvious blown play by whoever was supposed to have 90. Either Moton or Dickson. They both end up on top of the same man while 90 went untouched to Stewart. 

giphy.gif

 

Looks like maybe Norwell here? Not sure. But Norwell gets tossed aside right where Stewart was heading before breaking it outside. 

giphy.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Don't understand why a sneak is so hard to call there.

 

7 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

A quick look at those failed goal line runs by Stewart. 

 

1) This is an obvious blown play by whoever was supposed to have 90. Either Moton or Dickson. They both end up on top of the same man while 90 went untouched to Stewart. 

giphy.gif

Looks like maybe Norwell here? Not sure. But Norwell gets tossed aside right where Stewart was heading before breaking it outside. 

giphy.gif

 

 

Look ar Manhertz taking on 2 blocks and executing both!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what's the verdict on the OL?

Looks like it's back to the same ol' same ol' once we played a legit defense.

Such a shame to have this many talented core players in their primes the last several years but continually have a questionable offensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...