Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shula has already cost us one Super Bowl


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Fwiw, our offense played as well as the Broncos offense did.  Our offensive line couldn't block Von Miller and Demarcus Ware, both potential hall of famers.  Their offensive line couldn't block Kony Ealy.  We made more all around mistakes than they did.  Poor tackling on a punt return, missed field goal, and most importantly, turnovers.  That cost us the game.  Nothing else.  

Exactly. These same dozen posters who constantly spew ignorant posts and start stupid threads are annoying not only because they are wrong but only a small percentage of folks are knowledgeable enough to know it is crap. Even fewer are willing to state it and deal with the endless crap you take from folks all the way up to the owner of this site. People forget that Denver got handed their butt to them in the Super Bowl 2 years earlier when the Broncos had the most prolific offense in the league by far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Malt Liquor said:

Can we all agree that the bottom line is Mike Shula is a horrible offensive coordinator period. He has his moments. But even s h i t doesn't smell too bad if you hold your nose. Yeah he is not that good at his job.

I like his system, his play calling is terrible. Can we just get somebody to make adjustments and do the play-calling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Exactly. These same dozen posters who constantly spew ignorant posts and start stupid threads are annoying not only because they are wrong but only a small percentage of folks are knowledgeable enough to know it is crap. Even fewer are willing to state it and deal with the endless crap you take from folks all the way up to the owner of this site. People forget that Denver got handed their butt to them in the Super Bowl 2 years earlier when the Broncos had the most prolific offense in the league by far. 

Yes. The fact is Denver got really hot on the defensive side of the ball. Very FEW tackles would stand up to that pass rush. We could have made adjustments though but it wouldn't necessarily made a huge difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rayzor said:

i think he wants to prove it will still work. fox did the same thing.

i think to a large degree, shula's failing is rivera's failing and vice versa. i don't know who it is that is making the decision to change nothing, but right now i don't get the sense that this evolution was anything more than dreams without either the true intention or ability to make it happen.

There are always those people who believe so hard in their system - or themselves - that they will not accept any indication of flaws or weaknesses even when they've been clearly demonstrated. Heck, they'll double down rather than admit any issues exist.

One term often used to describe these people is "bad coaches". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

I like his system, his play calling is terrible. Can we just get somebody to make adjustments and do the play-calling?

This I largely agree with. I think Shula does a pretty decent job of game prepping it's just that he does an atrocious job of adapting within the game itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

Umm, yes they were. 2nd and 3 at the Chiefs 20 and a FG gets us an insurmountable 3 score lead. We pass twice and get out of FG range. The playcalling was stupid for that situation. You want nothing more than going for a first and at worst kicking a 37 yard FG which even Gano could do last year.

Shula calls good plays and the game's over as we would have been up 20-3 in the 4th quarter. Newton's pick 6 doesn't need to happen nor would a pass to KB for the fumble because we would still have been winning and could have kneeled down.

Funny that your example is exactly why Shula sucks. He has no clue what situations are and how to adjust and it cost us as many games last year as Ganope. 

Passes aren't bad plays if executed properly. It wasn't bad playcalling it was crappy execution and awareness on Cam's part. Who doesn't know you throw the ball away when you in field goal range. If I remember correctly he bailed to the left and there was a wide open receiver in the flat on one of the two sacks. Truth is Shula gets the crap when anyone messes up and 80% of the time it wasn't the play it was the execution. And most folks can't tell the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hallin'AllDaeDae said:

Shula's ideal offense is beautiful football. You smash the fug out of the other team on the ground, that's the given. Then, you get big chunk plays in the pass game. Soon, you can at will run, or pass.

20 play drive against Chiefs that ended in two sacks last year anybody ? Or were those two sacks Shula's fault ?

Shula's offensive philosophy is perfect for the Panthers

Weird. I could swear that sounds like an offense I heard of decades ago.

It was invented by a guy named Cory something...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are always those people who believe so hard in their system - or themselves - that they will not accept any indication of flaws or weaknesses even when they've been clearly demonstrated. Heck, they'll double down rather than admit any issues exist.

One term often used to describe these people is "bad coaches". 

And neither Shula or Rivera are that. Both have admitted their mistakes and sought help. Like Rivera has done with Madden and Shula has done heavily involving players and coaches. In fact Shula current system is nothing like he ran a decade ago and is heavily borrowed from Chud, the college game and other sources.

Anyone who can't see that must fit in the term of bad or at least uninformed poster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

it's one thing to admit a need for help and seek it out. it's another to implement and change and i don't really see that happening.

the mind is willing, but the decision making is weak.

that fact we kicked a FG on the 2yd line to put us only up by 6 against the team that scored a TD to beat us last time we played them in the same situation is a prime example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me and you clearly have different definitions of production. If you remove the 2023 season where Thielen had just over 1k yards he is 43rd on our all time receivers list just ahead of Jonathan Mingo. And before you ask why would we remove that season? Well a couple reasons. For one thing we won a whopping 2 games. And for the biggest. Thielen was 14th in targets in 2023. We absolutely force fed him the ball all season and finished with the 32nd passing offense. For comparison sake 33 year old Jerricho Cotchery eclipsed over 1k total yards in just 2 more games and with 67 less targets than Thielen did in that 2023 season. He has above average hands. That's it. We overpaid him because we were desperate and overvalued him. That's the reality no matter how many times you or anyone else wants to quote me and get defensive about it.
    • He's played great and it was a win-win (rare free agent) for both parties.  One of the points is he hasn't made enough difference to "waste" 35 million on. Another point is by the time Panthers are hitting their prime, he would have taken snaps away from young WRs/TEs/RBs. "Thus" in the long term, hurting the teams new future "window."  But I dare think of the monkey poo of a offense the Panthers had without him the past 2 years. Lack of talent leads to many problems, including paying a 35 year old to be somewhat respectable. Hes one of few that cared enough and made a effort. Plus you know he's done great stuff in many other ways for the team, community juggernaut, leadership, etc.  Judgement is for AT and his 3 year panther career!!
    • But it has gotten a little wacky. RBs-https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/contracts/_/position/rb     A couple months ago iggles made Bark the highest guaranteed RB, jeanty was until then. That's what matters the guarantee. A rookie never played a down was the leader, until iggles howie made things right.  If a safety gets drafted in the top 8 or so, he would have the highest money too or very close to it.    Add in TEs and C too.    Even with the fixed %, the numbers are getting too much for a player that's not proven themselves.     Plus anytime a QB is drafted it screws up the contracts for players around and if next year a punter gets drafted at the same 90th spot, they want the same contract with the 5.7% increase. Teams would be laughing.    Its just reached this point. Another 10 years and I bet the vets will be crying.     
×
×
  • Create New...