Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some Optimism - Only Two Teams Are Perfect Right Now


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, we're not the only team that legit look like a dumpster fire. 

To put everything in perspective, many "unstoppable" teams were given a huge challenge today in plenty of upsets. Only two teams currently are perfect:

  • Falcons - Should be 1-2 if it weren't for lucky, lucky breaks. Lions should've slammed in that throw from the 2 yard line, and the Bears dropped nearly every pass to the endzone when they were throwing to the endzone. Their offense only looked good against a terrible Packers defense. Otherwise, both sides of the ball were making mistakes and not looking as good on the other games.
  • Chiefs - Okay these guys are legit.

And now for the rest of the league:

  • Tampa got demolished by the Vikings offensively and defensively. Jameis Winston threw a good amount of picks, and were dominated nearly all game.
  • The Texans almost upset the Patriots, exposing their terrible defense. Unlike NO, the Patriots weakness is the front seven rather than secondary. That should help our offense out, though I said the same thing this weekend.
  • Bears upset the Steelers, throwing only one pass the whole game.
  • Redskins smothering the Raiders offensively and defensively. 
  • The Broncos were upset by a Bills team the Panthers just shut out last week.
  • Jets just upset the Dolphins. The worst team on paper got an actual dub and 20 points.
  • The Rams are good.
  • The Seahawks suck. 
  • The Giants suck. 
  • The Cowboys suck.
  • The Chargers suck.

So, we're 2-1. It's not the end of the world. We still have a chance against a bad defense next week too. Think of it as "Saints round 2." 

Hopefully, changes are made and the Panthers take their wake-up call seriously. We have a chance. That defensive performance is an anomaly, and this time running the ball against the Patriots front seven will actually work!

Just some optimism to clear out some of the pessimism plaguing this board right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Yep. That's also true.

That's actually not true seeing that we settled for 3 multiple times, at least three times inches away from getting 7 (to Benjamin, Shepard (great plays by Poyer), and a bad miss by Cam to CMC).  We didn't play as bad as people think vs Buffalo, especially in the first half, there were just relatively few possessions in that game as a whole (and McD does know us very well after all).

I just honestly think people's give a damn meter is on empty based on our insane mismanagement of Cam, insane officiating, and now politics/PC/disrespect to what many hold very sacred entering the fray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I will give you the Bears game, the Falcons totally dominated the Lions today and it wouldn't have been close without WR-aided (and tipped) picks. Both wins were also on the road. 

I'm on board with the thesis that outside of the Chiefs, no team has really separated from the pack, however. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally 2-1 would be considered a good start.

I think it's different this year. Cam has played below his capabilities for the last year, no matter what underlying factors have led to his struggles. And for the D to show weakness today as well, there is little reason to feel comfortable with our winning record through week 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Borat said:

While I will give you the Bears game, the Falcons totally dominated the Lions today and it wouldn't have been close without WR-aided (and tipped) picks. Both wins were also on the road. 

I'm on board with the thesis that outside of the Chiefs, no team has really separated from the pack, however. 

To be fair, I didn’t watch the whole Falcons game. I just went off seeing Matt ryan’s interceptions, a few comments from other analysts, and seeing the final few drives from the Lions. I’ll rewatch it so I can reassess that.

But yes, I’d say no one’s separated themselves as clear contenders aside the Chiefs so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

If you learned anything from today , it's that high tier QBs always eat our defenses alive and we still can't do jack on offense . The Patriots are much better than the Saints and it's an away game. Should be a blowout unless we find can find a way to score multiple Touchdowns 

Their defense was worse than the Saints according to DVOA going into this weekend. Their offense will be the big issue.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, stbugs said:

No we shouldn't. If you are going to say the Bills should have won, that ignores the fact that Cam missed a wide open 5 yard pass to McCaffery. We should have been up enough that the last drive by Buffalo should have been meaningless.

We should be 2-1 and are 2-1. It's not a happy 2-1, but Buffalo didn't outplay us in any way.

100% true.

But as I posted in another thread, RR not going for it on 4th down from the goal line last week and instead opting for 3 to go up 6...is EXACTLY how we lost to Buffalo 4 years ago.  I.e. nothing's changed, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, osiruz said:

Lol you guys just won't give the falcons any credit. Our offense looked like garbage with all the wr dropped picks. Our defense should have iced the game if not for a bogus call. However we are better than your panthers.

I give you credit. You guys made decisions with your coaching staff and its paying off. Its very frustrating to watch us struggle yet keep the same staff out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...