Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we bench Worley?


Crazydounut

Recommended Posts

The past few weeks Daryl Worley has been picked on a lot by opposing QB's. He has played 7, 8, 9. Hell, even 10+ yards off the line-of-scrimmage on most plays. Giving up 8-12 yard plays consistently when he is attacked. Then when he plays further up he gets burned by one of the slower (still talented) receivers in the game and Jeffrey. Then when he is in good coverage, he either gets a PI or doesn't make the play. He does have great tackling talent and is big enough to play safety (probably a more natural position for him.) Meaning we move a faster, more talented corner and Seymour to the #2 CB role. While at the same time having Worley be prepped for the starting safety position next season behind veteran Mike Adams. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Eazy-E said:

To add to him lacking the instincts, him not recovering that muffed punt was terrible. His reaction was so delayed. It’s like he didn’t comprehend that the ball was on the ground.

Exactly--looked like he froze.

Potential game changer--although Shula probably would have fuged up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After some of the calls last year probably won't see much of a drop off 
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48344034/nfl-begin-hiring-replacement-officials-given-state-negotiations-nfl-referees-association   Honestly fug these refs and their union. Resisting changes that would actually incentivize good performance and not seniority based systems. What a bunch of donkeys. Hope the replacements straight up take their jobs and never give them back. Sick of watching refs script games with no repercussions.
    • Donovan seems like highest risk to me. Lloyd and May have already established relationships with all these kids. There’s probably guys hitting the portal that they recruited from HS. And then there’s the possibility of transferring their own guys from their current teams. They’ve also been recruiting the HS kids for like the next 5 years already. Look at the Iowa coach who hit the ground running by transferring all his guys from his D2 program. Or going across sports to Cignetti transferring all his JMU guys year one then building off that to a national title year 2. Donovan is starting from square one having been in the NBA so long and he’s already 60. So you’re potentially punting year 1 for a guy you are just hoping to be a 10 year hire while you figure out how to actually develop your next home grown 20yr guy. That’s 1/10th of the time you have him, more or less at best. The hope would be that he would find some high level assistants who have been working the college recruiting trails already, but then are you giving up his ideal staff just to get a foothold in recruiting and transfers. Think Belichick year one was bad? Imagine how much worse it would be without Steve Belichicks transfer portal pulls. Hoping Mays or Lloyd are all they’re cracked up to be.
×
×
  • Create New...