Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We Lost to a Team Who's QB Only Completed 4 Passes

Castavar

By Castavar,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted

Let that sink in for a minute. We can't even beat a team that barely gets 150 yards and their QB only completes 4 passes. We had Cam, they had a rookie QB with WRs that should be in the Canadian League. How incompetent do you have to be at your job that you receive THAT much of a handicap and STILL lose. I don't think I've ever seen that before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, juliosantos said:

because  shula is a cuck

It still just mind boggles me how you can be so bad as an OC that you can't muster up enough to points to take advantage of THAT, with 10 days to prepare. That is next level suckage. And yet he will no doubt be here next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Castavar said:

It still just mind boggles me how you can be so bad as an OC that you can't muster up enough to points to take advantage of THAT, with 10 days to prepare. That is next level suckage. And yet he will no doubt be here next year.

Is it evident that we don't game-plan against defenses? Which might not be a problem if we can adjust in-game. But no Shula just sits up there in his stupid ass sky-box

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, beastson said:

Is it evident that we don't game-plan against defenses? Which might not be a problem if we can adjust in-game. But no Shula just sits up there in his stupid ass sky-box

It's obvious to anybody that has an ounce of football knowledge in them. Teams have been catching on ever since Denver's players came out and said we change nothing during a game. Players literally jump every single one of our plays because they know what's coming. Today I saw a safety haul ass from his spot to stifle Stew because he already knew a run up the gut was coming.

Also, someone needs to sabotage that sky box :shades:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dimbee Newbie

dimbee

Posted
Posted

Whatever you do, just make sure you give the Bears' Defense no credit. If they don't score 2 TDs, the Bears offense would have been required to play a much different game which would not have worked out well for the Bears. Because they had that 14 point cushion, there was no need to do anything than what they call "John Fox Football" - run it and count on the Defense to get stops. Which they did. I'm not talking smack, trust me. Lost in all of the Igo-fueled rumbling of changing offensive coaches is an admission that the Bears Defense outplayed the Panthers Offense today, regardless of scheme or play calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Let that sink in for a minute. We can't even beat a team that barely gets 150 yards and their QB only completes 4 passes. We had Cam, they had a rookie QB with WRs that should be in the Canadian League. How incompetent do you have to be at your job that you receive THAT much of a handicap and STILL lose. I don't think I've ever seen that before.

It literally makes me want to vomit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, dimbee said:

Whatever you do, just make sure you give the Bears' Defense no credit. If they don't score 2 TDs, the Bears offense would have been required to play a much different game which would not have worked out well for the Bears. Because they had that 14 point cushion, there was no need to do anything than what they call "John Fox Football" - run it and count on the Defense to get stops. Which they did. I'm not talking smack, trust me. Lost in all of the Igo-fueled rumbling of changing offensive coaches is an admission that the Bears Defense outplayed the Panthers Offense today, regardless of scheme of play calls.

Bears played good D. Don't want to discredit that. But let's be honest here, those 2 TDs were absolutely gift wrapped. I also believe this D shuts down that offense regardless of those fluke TDs. They had a rookie at QB and no names at WRs. There was no way they were going to get over 200 yds either way. We literally had to shoot ourselves to lose this one, and lo and behold we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, dimbee said:

Whatever you do, just make sure you give the Bears' Defense no credit. If they don't score 2 TDs, the Bears offense would have been required to play a much different game which would not have worked out well for the Bears. Because they had that 14 point cushion, there was no need to do anything than what they call "John Fox Football" - run it and count on the Defense to get stops. Which they did. I'm not talking smack, trust me. Lost in all of the Igo-fueled rumbling of changing offensive coaches is an admission that the Bears Defense outplayed the Panthers Offense today, regardless of scheme or play calls.

The Bears defense deserves credit, but it's not like they're the first team to do this sort of thing to us this season.

We've seen this movie before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Let that sink in for a minute. We can't even beat a team that barely gets 150 yards and their QB only completes 4 passes. We had Cam, they had a rookie QB with WRs that should be in the Canadian League. How incompetent do you have to be at your job that you receive THAT much of a handicap and STILL lose. I don't think I've ever seen that before.

Not only did we lose today to a QB that only completed 4 passes, but he we lost the game by 14 points even though the defense only gave up FG. But, as I said in an post under another topic, we shouldn't be surprised. We lost SB 50 to A Denver team that gained less than 200 yards on offense for the entire game. If you look at the statistics from the game I still can't believe we lost that Super Bowl. 

Still, how do you manage to lose a game where the QB only competes 4 passes?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Htarnation4.0
      I'm All In On Drafting a QB in Round 1

      By Htarnation4.0 · Posted

      And if he is you snatch that guy
    • kungfoodude
      Is Canales digging his own grave?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      The wife thing is infuriating because it just shows the kind of shitshow Tepper has really run and how insanely unprofessional we are as a franchise. If you have any random, unqualified family member putting their two cents in to a critical draft decision, you are already off the reservation. IMO, that can largely extend to the owner, as well. I realize they have privileges there due to the ownership but I am firmly in the camp of, "Let your football people handle football stuff." We don't do that. Tepper is too smart to let these peons run his IRL fantasy football team.
    • kungfoodude
      Not Necessarily Panthers Related but....

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Bradford and Pennington would have passed 2nd round criteria. The 1st round criteria is a little higher and career longevity isn't factored. Years started is, because as a 1st round draft pick, the expectation is that you will be a starter and likely for a long time. But you can see why I shied away from using statistical means. You can end up cutting some objectively amazing players like Steve McNair or Cam Newton. Or even someone like Eli Manning.  That's why I stayed with award/accolade or length of starting career or career. The logic being that if your peers(HOF), the fans/peers(Pro Bowl) or the media(All Pro) regarded you as one of the best, that accounts for a lot. It's taking a wide swath of largely well regarded opinions about a player's performance. In a manner of speaking so does career and starting length. That is the greater NFL(FO, coaching staffs, etc) saying that you are a valuable addition to the organization in some capacity(starter or backup). Statistics are tough because they ignore changes in the game and the vast differences in individual QB's. Cam was never a high completion percentage guy but he dominated many of the games he started. He changed the way people played us. TD:INT ratio seems like a decent enough marker but it eliminates gunslingers and especially old school style gunslingers. Guys that might have had MVP caliber performances(McNair) couldn't meet that criteria.  It would probably be equally difficult to screen players by career winning percentage, QB rating, etc. Using individual statistical means to measure a career is really fuging hard. Doesn't mean I can't use them but I need input because a lot of the things I have attempted just didn't have great results in what I would say are "successful" careers. And my methodology isn't perfect. Certainly there are strong arguments against some of them people that met my criteria. Largely the Pro Bowl. I suppose I could increase that to 2+.
×
×
  • Create New...