Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know it's not keen, but man. Props to Gettlemen again. At least when our QB goes down, we can still win games.

JakeDel5674

By JakeDel5674,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jesse Rising Star

Jesse

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

No we can't. Have you seen Anderson lately? He should be retired already.

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JakeDel5674 Newbie

JakeDel5674

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Jesse said:

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

Correct.  Thank you, sir.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JakeDel5674 Newbie

JakeDel5674

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, micnificent28 said:

I don’t think this is fair... they had a plan in place and Brett Hundley was highly thought of as a prospect and the packers had gotten offers for him for a year or so,they just thought he was a good back up. Sometime plans to work out.. but they had a plan.

Hundley coming out of UCLA was garbage.  He had like the most interceptions in that Pac-12 that year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JakeDel5674 Newbie

JakeDel5674

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

No Cam, means no running game, no running games means no milking the clock, which in return means this defense would suffer.

We would be just as bad

Do you see what the Packers have on Defense right now?  No fuging way we would be just as bad as they are.  They are pure garbage.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      Rookie PFF Grades

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Got to give some credit to the coaching staff on these. You can grab top talents but without good coaching, they just fizzle out. We've seen that a lot around here.  
    • Anybodyhome
      Canes vs Blackhawks 7pm

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      Oh, no TV for tonight's game unless you have the NHL Network, I believe. I could be wrong, hopefully?
    • t96
      Rookie PFF Grades

      By t96 · Posted

      Early returns are great and exciting but also worth noting that Gettleman had a few drafts that looked incredible early on and wound up mostly sucking (2014 mainly). Also PFF; grain of salt, etc.    I'm completely sold on Tet being a stud, knocked a high pick out of the park like we needed to and always should. Nearly sold on Scourton. Not sold on Princely but he had flashes. Not sold on Etienne as more than a 3rd stringer and special teamer, but that's not terrible for his draft position. Big fan of Ransom and think he'll be a starter.  Cam Jackson : IDK, I see limited upside but we didn't see much of him Evans was a nice find for draft position and he had a great rookie year for a late round rookie TE with plenty of veteran competition. Not sure about his upside though, seems like best case is a long term #2/3 TE, which isn't bad. Jimmy Horn, personally I didn't see a damn thing from him that impressed me all year. And he got a lot of opportunities. Pulling for the kid, but not convinced he's an NFLer.   UDFA: Fitzgerald was an amazing find
×
×
  • Create New...