I know it's not keen, but man. Props to Gettlemen again. At least when our QB goes down, we can still win games.

[JakeDel5674]

Watching that Packers game was rough last night.  They're literally awful without Aaron Rodgers.  It's a damn travesty the fact their GM could be lazy all these years, and just bank on his QB leading them to the Playoffs.  

[Snake]

Goes to show no matter how good of a OC you are you need a Good QB too. 

[KillerKat]

No we can't. Have you seen Anderson lately? He should be retired already.

[JakeDel5674]

Just now, KillerKat said:

No we can't. Have you seen Anderson lately? He should be retired already.

I mean, our Defense would keep us in the game though.  Unlike the Packers, which has pure trash around Aaron Rodgers on both sides of the ball.  

[JARROD]

We definitely need a reliable backup. 

[JakeDel5674]

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

Goes to show no matter how good of a OC you are you need a Good QB too. 

Detroit never punted last night.  NOT ONCE DID THEY PUNT.  So, no.  It wasn't all on Hundley, even though he sucks.  

[Jesse]

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

No we can't. Have you seen Anderson lately? He should be retired already.

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

[JakeDel5674]

1 minute ago, Jesse said:

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

Correct.  Thank you, sir.  

[GoobyPls]

No Cam, means no running game, no running games means no milking the clock, which in return means this defense would suffer.

We would be just as bad

[micnificent28]

I don’t think this is fair... they had a plan in place and Brett Hundley was highly thought of as a prospect and the packers had gotten offers for him for a year or so,they just thought he was a good back up. Sometime plans to work out.. but they had a plan.

[JakeDel5674]

Just now, micnificent28 said:

I don’t think this is fair... they had a plan in place and Brett Hundley was highly thought of as a prospect and the packers had gotten offers for him for a year or so,they just thought he was a good back up. Sometime plans to work out.. but they had a plan.

Hundley coming out of UCLA was garbage.  He had like the most interceptions in that Pac-12 that year.  

[JakeDel5674]

4 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

No Cam, means no running game, no running games means no milking the clock, which in return means this defense would suffer.

We would be just as bad

Do you see what the Packers have on Defense right now?  No fuging way we would be just as bad as they are.  They are pure garbage.  

[GoobyPls]

Just now, JakeDel5674 said:

Do you see what the Packers have on Defense right now?  No fuging way we would be just as bad as they are.  They are pure garbage.  

We would be like the Broncos.

[JakeDel5674]

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

We would be like the Broncos.

Don't agree with that.  Since 2015, the Broncos Defense has gotten worse.