Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That Packers #26th ranked Defense...

Hotsauce

By Hotsauce,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Actually we played Brees very well. It seems like people forget the punt return fumble, punter turning the ball over, Peppers penalty and Matt Kalils 30 yards of Face Mask penalties and Funchess stone hands in that game.

those plays,.. the game was a lot closer than the score.

We did not play him well at all. Not only did we not get pressure but he faked out our secondary all day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
Just now, Snake said:

We did not play him well at all. Not only did we not get pressure but he faked out our secondary all day. 

Dude take back the punt return and punter fumbles and we probably win that game. Take back peppers penalty and we probably win that game,... it was just filled with stupid mistakes but otherwise we should have beaten them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Dude take back the punt return and punter fumbles and we probably win that game. Take back peppers penalty and we probably win that game,... it was just filled with stupid mistakes but otherwise we should have beaten them.

I seriously doubt that. We got out muscled that game and tackling was terrible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
Just now, Snake said:

I seriously doubt that. We got out muscled that game and tackling was terrible. 

It was only a 10 point game with one touchdown drive that was a 3 and out and another stop extended by 30 yards by Matt Kalil, another scoring drive by Clay fumbling on the punt, and another on our punter turning the ball over on our own 35.

then we still had a chance with all that at the end when the game was close if peppers doesn’t bodyslam a guy out of bounds.

see? You take back the scores off of those and we win with even 21 points

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I'm not convinced Aaron Rodgers will suit up for this game. After watching Keenum get sacked that many times yesterday, would you put your newly healed QB in Kuechly's crosshairs?

yeah really, Jerry Jones doesn't run every team...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dpm0409 Enthusiast

dpm0409

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hotsauce said:

I’m calling it. There is no way Rodgers does not play Sunday. If there is a 0.00001% chance of playoffs, Rodgers (and his ego) are playing.

Completely agree with this.  And he'll be looking to avenge the L we gave him and the Packers in 2015.

microsoftSUX_0_0_0.gif.f998f8929632f2424fe4d2fff6cf1739.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...