Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rod Chudzinski


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

And that's Rivera too.

yep. very much a pervasive coaching philosophy, which leads me to believe that unless the new organizational leadership intervenes and forces a change at OC or....incredibly unlikely...shula gets a HC offer somewhere, we won't be seeing any changes at OC as long as ron is HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say this much. Chudzinski's style of offense is much better suited to Cam Newton's skill set. With Shula, you've got one of the most dynamic athletes in the game and you're using him in a conservative game plan.

That doesn't mean I want Chud back, but I acknowledge that at least he has a better idea of how to use Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

yep. very much a pervasive coaching philosophy, which leads me to believe that unless the new organizational leadership intervenes and forces a change at OC or....incredibly unlikely...shula gets a HC offer somewhere, we won't be seeing any changes at OC as long as ron is HC.

Shula and Rivera are joined at the hip. You'll never separate them.

The only situation I can imagine coming close would be if we had such a disaster that  a scapegoat was demanded, and even then it'd probably be Ken Dorsey.

Given our current ownership situation, there's no way I see that happening anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our best chance was one of the college teams that had an opening were interested in Shula, but that ship's sailed. He has no shot at an NFL HC job, even if Cam catches fire and we win a couple playoff games. I agree with most that the only way he goes is if Rivera goes with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, rayzor said:

totally agreed. the problem was he was too confident in his ability to wheel and deal which JR had to put the kibosh on a couple times in 2010. i always thought hurney had a gambling problem and the draft was his game of choice.

what was he trying to do in 2010 that JR had to intervene and force stop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

what was he trying to do in 2010 that JR had to intervene and force stop?

iirc, trading up to get pickles....or at least told him not to trade away the 2011 first round pick because he knew hurney's tendencies. that might have been the extent of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

iirc, trading up to get pickles....or at least told him not to trade away the 2011 first round pick because he knew hurney's tendencies. that might have been the extent of it.

I think he might actually be referring to 2011, as if I recall correctly that was the year that the massive contracts were handed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I will say this much. Chudzinski's style of offense is much better suited to Cam Newton's skill set. With Shula, you've got one of the most dynamic athletes in the game and you're using him in a conservative game plan.

That doesn't mean I want Chud back, but I acknowledge that at least he has a better idea of how to use Newton.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, rayzor said:

iirc, trading up to get pickles....or at least told him not to trade away the 2011 first round pick because he knew hurney's tendencies. that might have been the extent of it.

my impression was that it fell through and JR had no intervention

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Which is pretty much all he'd have done.

Assistants are chosen by head coaches, not general managers. That's pretty much true all over the league other than in a few occasional exceptions.

If you remember when reporters asked about Richard Rodgers, Gettleman said "that's a Ron question." He pointed out that he could make suggestions but coaching staff decisions belonged to Rivera.

Shula's promotion was Rivera's decision, not Gettleman's.

which is why when you bring in a new GM, you should let him select a new head coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty much.

I think Hurney genuinely believes he's good at his job and the failures of the past were probably someone else's fault.

Back in june he admitted to his failures during his previous stint with the Panthers.

Just to help you avoid being wrong again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...