Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera likely gone with new owner


Paa Langfart

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

$ 2+ billion dollars is a lot of money to spend and not have your own guys in place.

Perhaps, but the sale is going to take too long for anything to happen this year.

Coaching staffs have to be in place before free agency and the draft. No way the sale gets done before then. And even if it did, you've got interviews and all that. It takes time to build a staff. Throw in that by that time, anybody that was worth hiring would already have a job.

Current leadership will probably continue through next season. After that, it's anybody's guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised either way, but if he's out...he will have a job in 10 seconds.

 

My biggest gripe with Ron is his stubbornness.  Too stubborn to move on from Shula, too stubborn to move on from washed up vets, etc....just cannot change quickly enough to be effective in this league.

That said, were I the new owner, I would just have a long interview/conversation with him about where he wants the franchise to go...both with the team side, and FO, before I hire the new GM.  If mine and his direction were similar, and he agrees with the GM that I would bring in...he can stay....unless the new GM wants him gone as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
    • Yeah, this is all projections of how it will turn out. Inevitability this list will look ridiculous in a full 2025 sesson hindsight, most likely. Still, I am pretty surprised that so many bristled at being thought of as having very, very lowly ranked WR and TE units. We literally have been for years. All you have to do is just have things stay the same and those are immediately bottom 5 units. It is easy to see why one would be reticent to have lofty expectations in the preseason. Gotta show it first when you are a perennial cellar dweller. That's just life at the bottom.
×
×
  • Create New...