Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spagnuolo claims Patriots knew Eagles' signals in Super Bowl XXXIX


Palmetto

Recommended Posts

Dont know if it was posted already

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/spagnuolo-patriots-knew-eagles-signals-super-bowl-xxxix-article-1.3786912

 

"Steve Spagnuolo was always suspicious of the Patriots.

Two years before SpyGate came to light, the former Giants defensive coordinator, who was linebackers coach for the Eagles in 2004 when they played the Patriots in the Super Bowl, said that the defensive coaching staff became suspicious that the Patriots knew what was coming before each play."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

And those games were so close, they most likely would've lost them if they didn't.

More likely than not. It's sad too because Belichick is legitimately one of the best football minds ever. He could've easily placed himself among the greats without cheating. Tragic "hero" I guess...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

Even if the NFL had evidence they would never release it

The NFL destroyed all the video evidence back in 2008... Without even viewing it all... Complete horsesh*t and the entire deflategate thing was only so big because the league went so easy on extremely serious cheating the first time. Sean Payton was suspended a year for the bountygate stuff; Belichick should've been suspended at least two, because as far as integrity of the game goes the Pats' cheating was at least twice as bad as the bountygate stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's three for three now. ESPN reported on this years ago. There were handwritten diagrams of the Steelers 2002 signals in the 2002 AFC Championship. Coincidentally, the Patriots beat them by seven points. It even goes into detail on the Eagles claims - somehow, the Pats knew exactly what to do when the Eagles broke out their rarely-used dime defense, which they planned specifically for that game to stop Brady.

Marshall Faulk said the Patriots knew their signals. Our entire organization, including Hurney, was convinced the Patriots stole signals; once we changed out plan to something they didn't know, their defense couldn't do anything to stop us. Hines Ward says the Pats knew their signals in 2002. And now Spagnuolo says they knew signals, and the Giants win over them in 2007 was in part because he came in prepared for it.

These aren't nobodies making these claims. It's a Hall of Famer, a general manager, and a defensive coordinator. This was an open secret for years. The Patriots stole three Super Bowls. In the process they robbed Kurt Warner of a second title and an arguable dynasty, our 2003 team of one of the greatest underdog stories in sports history, and a great Eagles team having overcome years of playoff faults.

If the NFL acted on this, there wouldn't be just a suspension of Belicheck. This would be grounds to strip the Patriots franchise entirely, or at the very least strip their three titles. That's a massive scandal that puts even things like the Black Sox scandal to shame. Mike Martz said as much - Goodell told him to sign off on the investigation being great because a Congressional investigation would have been bad for the league. Bad is, of course, an understatement.

So instead, they destroyed the evidence and basically gave the Pats a final warning. The Deflategate penalties were so harsh in part because of that.

Of course, I don't think the tapes are truly gone. Nobody makes just one copy of a tape. When one of those types leaks, the Pats will have hell to pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh, change your signals. 

I don’t consider that cheating and I hate the Patriots. 

If the Panthers went to 7 Superbowls and won 5, and people were claiming they won because of signals and deflated footballs everyone here would be defending to their dying breath.

its retarded. Dale Earhart(hated him too, but he was the best)was once asked about another driver who won a lot but not championships— was he a good driver—

the answer was “He’s a great driver, but he doesn’t know how to race”

Belicheck knows how to race. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Ahhh, change your signals. 

I don’t consider that cheating and I hate the Patriots. 

If the Panthers went to 7 Superbowls and won 5, and people were claiming they won because of signals and deflated footballs everyone here would be defending to their dying breath.

its retarded. Dale Earhart(hated him too, but he was the best)was once asked about another driver who won a lot but not championships— was he a good driver—

the answer was “He’s a great driver, but he doesn’t know how to race”

Belicheck knows how to race. 

NASCAR allowed and tolerated, and still does, a culture of cheating. That's part of stock car racing. You build the best car and hope you don't get beat.

The NFL is different. No other team was taping like this. No other team has been accused of anything remotely similar. The Saints fans make the same pathetic excuse with Bountygate.

Everyone bends the rules. The Saints and Pats threw the rules in the blender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Ahhh, change your signals. 

All three teams changed their signals in their pre-SB walkthroughs, and also implemented several brand new plays never shown before that the Patriots magically knew what they were before the snap. Players, coaches, front office members from all three teams (and most of whom are proven classy people who wouldn't just be salty about losing) have alluded to that fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure somewhere down the road, there'll be a big expose' where either an investigation or a longtime member of the Patriots organization will reveal the full depth of the Patriots cheating.

It'll probably be a long time coming, but I won't be the least bit surprised if it happens.

And if that info does get out, it'll likely be the single biggest scandal in sports history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Ahhh, change your signals. 

I don’t consider that cheating and I hate the Patriots. 

If the Panthers went to 7 Superbowls and won 5, and people were claiming they won because of signals and deflated footballs everyone here would be defending to their dying breath.

its retarded. Dale Earhart(hated him too, but he was the best)was once asked about another driver who won a lot but not championships— was he a good driver—

the answer was “He’s a great driver, but he doesn’t know how to race”

Belicheck knows how to race. 

You can try to down play it all you want, but knowing another teams signals is HUGE. It's very difficult to just change on the fly. Comparing this to your Earnhardt example is retarded as fug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Falcons win was a fantastic way to end the season and I think just about every Panthers fan would agree the team the coaching staff and particularly Bryce Young were impressive. We really needed that. Credit where it's due. At the same time. Now we have to establish it wasn't just a flash in the pan. We had one of those earlier in the season against the Raiders. As a tortured Panthers fan I have to acknowledge that. I know you're joking but in all seriousness I don't think the QB sneak is something for us to be concerned about in general but I would be lying to myself if I did not acknowledge that looking back at one particular game last season where we continually trotted out Eddie Pinero on 4th and short on the opponents side of the field we could use some creativity in those situations and it's also a matter of predictability. As time goes on it's something for Canales to work on and figure out. Especially with our kicker situation as it stands.
    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
×
×
  • Create New...