Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marcus Peters to the Rams


JakeDel5674

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Marcogreenbush said:

And we're sitting on our damn ass taking it . Hey hurney why don't you make some moves it's probably our last real chance we have at making a Super Bowl run 

Great. Somebody else that's going to start making a lot of pointless posts. It's not even free agency yet. Chill out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mjligon said:

Hey look another NFC contender doing whatever it takes to improve.

We bout to franchise tag Gano though!!!

G-man taught us the best way to win is make sure you don't go after expensive players. Instead prove your brilliance by starting Scrub McGee in vital positions and seeing if it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Skack25 said:

Peters has to be some sort of problem (not including the obvious evidence when you watch him play).  That secondary would have been tops in the league with EB, Fuller AND Peters.

Ammerson too.

Kind of surprised but also not surprised. I do think the Rams locker room is perfect for Peter's though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mjligon said:

Hey look another NFC contender doing whatever it takes to improve.

We bout to franchise tag Gano though!!!

Well you can improve your team every year. What matters is that your old players don't get there feeling hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dex said:

There was. 

It was rather minimal. Remember the threads about how the other Charles Johnson and no hands Russell Shepard were just waiting to light up the league?

You think Hurney receives the same benefit of the doubt for bargain shopping if the roles are flipped?

Personally I'm open to a trade or whatever we need to do to improve the offense, but I'm not going to flip out in February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

It was rather minimal. Remember the threads about how the other Charles Johnson and no hands Russell Shepard were just waiting to light up the league?

You think Hurney receives the same benefit of the doubt for bargain shopping if the roles are flipped?

Personally I'm open to a trade or whatever we need to do to improve the offense, but I'm not going to flip out in February.

I'm getting older so I may be misremembering things but I thought going into last year's season WR was a huge concern. I had no optimism going into the season with our WR crop. We've been in desperate need of a playmaker capable of YAC since 2014. No one gets a pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dex said:

I'm getting older so I may be misremembering things but I thought going into last year's season WR was a huge concern. I had no optimism going into the season with our WR crop. We've been in desperate need of a playmaker capable of YAC since 2014. No one gets a pass.

It was to a degree but people bought into the notion we could just plug in whoever and be good. I really hope they have learned form that. Even moreso our FO.

Honestly the situation is even more dire this year. We have Funchess who right now is a #2, and two guys with potential but nothing else coming off season ending injuries in Samuel and Byrd. Plus Olsen spent most of last season hurt or trying to get back into the swing of things.

I completely agree with you about needing a playmaker. We're still trying to replace Steve Smith. I know people don't care for him anymore, but we need someone with capabilities like that or it's just going to be more of the same hoping and praying for magic from Cam Newton to save the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...