Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's say it's your audition...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

You're the head coach or the GM of a team that's on the verge of being sold, and you've got basically one season to show the new owner why they should keep you around.

Do you play it safe or go full speed ahead?

As the head coach, are you going for it on fourth and one, blitzing till the last play, running up the score any chance you get, pulling out crazy trick plays, etc.  Or do you play it conservative, risk nothing, play for field goals and overtime and such?

If you're the GM, are you gonna push to put your stamp on the team?  Sign the big name free agent, make the crazy trade, go for the high risk / high reward player in the draft because screw it, you may as well go down swinging?  Or would you rather take low risk draft picks and work primarily on re-signing the guys who are already here and giving the roster just a minor tweak or two?

To be clear, you can answer differently for the two spots. Also, didn't include players in this because players are pretty much always giving it their all.

Which way would you play it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Shouldn't take the team being sold to try and win a Super Bowl. You should do what it takes every season regardless of the outside situation 

Granted, but it is. And honestly, there are people who believe either path is the best way to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Shouldn't take the team being sold to try and wina Super Bowl. You should do what it takes every season regardless of the outside situation 

I can't ever remember a situation like this in the NFL. The pieces are here to win a Super Bowl. Change should always be the motivating factor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Perhaps, but patience isn't necessarily an option when you've got one year to show the new boss that you're worth keeping.

That was more in response to his insinuation that going all-out every year is what a team should be doing. 

In answer to your question, I would do what I could to win immediately if I really thought that I had the core to do it. If I didn't, I would just put my best foot forward and try to show improvement while shoring up my "spin" game---self-promotion to include my plan for that specific season and how to build upon it toward long term success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

That was more in response to his insinuation that going all-out every year is what a team should be doing. 

In answer to your question, I would do what I could to win immediately if I really thought that I had the core to do it. If I didn't, I would just put my best foot forward and try to show improvement while shoring up my "spin" game---self-promotion to include my plan for that specific season and how to build upon it toward long term success. 

lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

That was more in response to his insinuation that going all-out every year is what a team should be doing. 

In answer to your question, I would do what I could to win immediately if I really thought that I had the core to do it. If I didn't, I would just put my best foot forward and try to show improvement while shoring up my "spin" game---self-promotion to include my plan for that specific season and how to build upon it toward long term success. 

Is that the coach or GM level or both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Is that the coach or GM level or both?

I was thinking from a GM's perspective. From a coach's perspective, you're going to go all-out every week even if you know that you're going against tougher competition on paper. You know, "any given Sunday" and all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you draft considering most of the contracts are for 4 years.  Most coaches do not want rookies on the field, but we all act as if our drafts have to fill 8 spots.  I want to see impact players in the first 2 rounds, depth and developmental later.

Rivera has always been conservative and would be more conservative if Jake or Berlein were his qb.  Riverboat is not even close.   Turner needs more autonomy over the offense and RR needs to watch the D more, considering the Coordinator situations.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the bottom line is that you do your job to the best of your abilities.

Perhaps having a new boss makes you re-evaluate some of what you do, and perhaps that can be a good thing.  But I don't think it fundamentally changes you.  Like any job, you should be judged on your results.  If you're getting good results compared to your competitors, you have nothing to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WR: Nico, Woods, Tank (R) TE: Schultz OL: Tunsil/Howard/Deiter/Mason/Fant vs. WR: Chark, Thielen, Mingo (R) TE: Hurst OL: Icky/Zavala (R)/Bozeman/Jensen (R)/Moton   Panthers' had the better OL before losing BC week 1 and AC week 4 which is kind of ironic considering how in the following year DB went down in W1 and Shaq in W4 resulting in the defense going all to Hell. CJ has done amazing in Houston, but he also wasn't asked to carry Zavala, Jensen, Mingo, Hurst, and Chark as a rookie.
    • Past 5 seasons, IMO CJ Stroud and Joe Burrow are the 2 best young QBs that have emerged in the league in that window.  They also didn’t need vets to be their primary pass catchers.  They helped fellow youngsters be great at WR.   almost all the other young QBs have been paired up with vets in their top options….and haven’t been as promising.  so it isn’t Madden.  But the league hasn’t played out as you suggest it does.   Good QBs make others around them better.   
    • In 2023 their roster wasn’t stacked. They nailed the poo out of the 2023 draft and since they knew Davis Mills wasn’t the guy, they tanked properly to get pick 2. They also took Cleveland’s ridiculous offer for Watson unlike us with Burns. Houston received enough draft capital to jump up to 3 while picking up the right guys in Anderson and Stroud. The Texans were not stacked or better than us in 2023. They had 11 total wins from 2020 to 2022. They didn’t have a terrible front office so they made sure they got their QB of the future while tanking well and getting more draft picks. They are a textbook study of what we should have done in 2022/2023 offseason even though people in here still think tanking is a bad word and our culture would be bad if we were the Texans. We literally had the chance to be the Texans right now and fuged it up.
×
×
  • Create New...