Historically, Panthers near bottom of total number of picks

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

So no, you can't.

"Gettleman doesn't come to this forum?" Really?

Want respect? Make a better argument and don't resort to stuff that makes you sound like a twelve year old.

Just like I thought,  you hypocrite. 

[Mr. Scot]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Just like I thought,  you hypocrite. 

Same MO. Lose the argument, resort to this.

Oy...

[top dawg]

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Same MO. Lose the argument, resort to this.

Oy...

Same MO. Lose the argument,  resort to more patronizing remarks. 

Unlike you,  I own up to my bullshit,  indiscretions, mistakes,  and will even apologize if I earnestly offend someone. You,  on the other hand,  continue your same old bullshit.  

 

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, top dawg said:

Same MO. Lose the argument,  resort to more patronizing remarks. 

Unlike you,  I own up to my bullshit,  indiscretions, mistakes,  and will even apologize if I earnestly offend someone. You,  on the other hand,  continue your same old bullshit. 

You're not exactly demonstrating than in this thread.

 

[top dawg]

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You're not exactly demonstrating than in this thread.

 

What I've demonstrated in this thread is the same thing I always demonstrate: rational reasons as to why I believe what I believe, and without suggesting that someone is delusional,  silly,  or crazy because they don't  believe exactly like I do.  Moreover,  what I've also demonstrated is a willingness to address disrespect and misrepresenting---basically just lying about what I did or didn't say,  or what I mean.  When you come at me by lying,  I'm going to respond in full force.  You don't like it?  Stop fuging with me.  If you can't  address or reference me with respect,  then don't  whine when I get in the gutter with you.  But I won't lie,  I'll be real as that is how I've always been.  

[Toomers]

2 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Please just ignore that guy, he gets furious and baits you in to conflicts over random conspiracies that are just steaming in his own head and tries to label you as the antagonist for them. He will have you arguing over something you never said. His name fits him.

How about you speak to me if you want to say something about me. Let me translate your statement.

  Don’t argue with this guy because he will use facts to make your silly theories look k stupid. Then you will have to threaten to put him on ignore to get out of it. Even though you won’t as proven today

[Toomers]

3 hours ago, top dawg said:

What is this agenda?  Oh, I guess it's to play you Gettleman worshippers like a Stradivarius.  Perhaps it's a Pavlovian experiment.  That's it!

I've discussed way more than Gettleman over the years,  even during the past month.  Week! It's only when I get into these petty little arguments over the pettiness of Gettlemanites or Hurney bashers that I really even bring the man's name up anymore. LOL

Agenda? My only agenda is to have interesting discussion about the Panthers and cheer them on to a championship.  I would think that's why we're all here. 

So first you never start these discussions with trying to start an argument? Now, when your make an ignorant statement, it’s trolling us DG “lovers” or whatever excuse it is. Like I said, keep moving the goalposts until your moral compass feels good. Because everyone else is the hypocrite. Right?

[Mr. Scot]

30 minutes ago, top dawg said:

What I've demonstrated in this thread is the same thing I always demonstrate: rational reasons as to why I believe what I believe, and without suggesting that someone is delusional,  silly,  or crazy because they don't  believe exactly like I do.  Moreover,  what I've also demonstrated is a willingness to address disrespect and misrepresenting---basically just lying about what I did or didn't say,  or what I mean.  When you come at me by lying,  I'm going to respond in full force.  You don't like it?  Stop fuging with me.  If you can't  address or reference me with respect,  then don't  whine when I get in the gutter with you.  But I won't lie,  I'll be real as that is how I've always been.  

Yeah. Everything about your posts in this thread says "rational discussion".

Nobody's whining but you, dude. You want respect? This is not how you get it.

[Saca312]

5 hours ago, top dawg said:

 But,  what did Ron do?  He just went out and led the team to the Super Bowl, a team that no one predicted would be there.  

you're not fooling anyone by trying to say 2015 was all Ron.

 

[Moo Daeng]

4 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

If they used the 1994 draft, the numbers are a little off, since we didn't get any selections in that draft.  Counting our first (April 1995) thru the 2016 draft, we averaged  7.95 picks per draft, which is slightly better.  But maybe I  am reading it wrong.

The chart shows per draft numbers 

[top dawg]

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

So first you never start these discussions with trying to start an argument? Now, when your make an ignorant statement, it’s trolling us DG “lovers” or whatever excuse it is. Like I said, keep moving the goalposts until your moral compass feels good. Because everyone else is the hypocrite. Right?

My moral compass is strongly intact, and for you to suggest it's not because of a facetious label at an ex-GM's expense (while "nicely" crushing Marty Hurney) is the epitome of being disingenuous.  

[KendrickPanther]

I see a correlation between winning and good QB play.... Bret Favre and Drew Bledsoe followed up by Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady will do that. Ben Roethlisberger and Kordell Stewart had good runs. 

[top dawg]

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah. Everything about your posts in this thread says "rational discussion".

Nobody's whining but you, dude. You want respect? This is not how you get it.

Lying about and being patronizing toward fellow posters is not how you get it either. in fact,  it's how you lose it. 

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, KendrickPanther said:

I see a correlation between winning and good QB play.... Bret Favre and Drew Bledsoe followed up by Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady will do that. Ben Roethlisberger and Kordell Stewart had good runs. 

That's probably more true than not.  I choose to believe that Cam has had overall good QB play (though some may disagree), certainly enough to win more than we do,  so I can't help but start looking at other reasons for arguably disappointing seasons, or at least seasons where expectations weren't met.