Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants control the draft?


Recommended Posts

I found this on CBS Sports.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/why-giants-and-dave-gettleman-control-how-the-first-round-of-the-2018-nfl-draft-unfolds/

I am more inclined to believe the Browns still control the draft.  They have 2 of the 1st for pick.  What they do will dictate what the Giants will do.

If they Take Chubbs or Barkley with the first pick.  This leaves Barkley open for NYG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barkley has to be the first pick.  He just has to be.  I know it's  the Browns,  but even they can't find a way not to take Barkley.  This is a KISS moment if I've ever seen one.  

 

 

 

I also expect them to make a run at AJ McCarron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you looked back to prior years, you'd find an article explaining how the team with the #2 pick actually controls the draft on almost an annual basis.

The theory generally goes that once the team at #1 has a consensus pick or narrows its focus or indicates they won't trade down or blah blah whatever, the #2 team is sitting in the driver's seat. I didn't read the above article, but it won't surprise me if it's based on some variation of that theme.

I guess every year or so this notion hits some analyst like a revelation and they believe they have a new idea, so then off we go again.

Heck, I think one that's those articles might even have been written about us the year we had that pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Browns get a FA QB, then Barkley is the shoe-in. However, the two options that they've fuged up on with Alex Smith and Captain Kirk really rule out that happening. I just don't think anyone wants to play up there and they may not have a choice but to draft a QB. They should be breaking the bank for Kirk. Or just sign Kaperneck and get it over with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

If the Browns get a FA QB, then Barkley is the shoe-in. However, the two options that they've fuged up on with Alex Smith and Captain Kirk really rule out that happening. I just don't think anyone wants to play up there and they may not have a choice but to draft a QB. They should be breaking the bank for Kirk. Or just sign Kaperneck and get it over with. 

Scenarios based on the Browns doing the right thing or the smart thing rarely pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think if you looked back to prior years, you'd find an article explaining how the team with the #2 pick actually controls the draft on almost an annual basis.

The theory generally goes that once the team at #1 has a consensus pick or narrows its focus or indicates they won't trade down or blah blah whatever, the #2 team is sitting in the driver's seat. I didn't read the above article, but it won't surprise me if it's based on some variation of that theme.

I guess every year or so this notion hits some analyst like a revelation and they believe they have a new idea, so then off we go again.

Heck, I think one that's those articles might even have been written about us the year we had that pick.

You're pretty spot on about how the article reads.

In most years but because they have #4 I think they have more power on the way the draft will go.  Most mocks have them taking Darnold.  However, if they take Barkley that shakes up the top 5 all together.  Plus at number 4 they still will get a "Predicted" Franchise QB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Marcogreenbush said:

Is this a giants forum? Gettleman has too many fanboys for doing nothing special 

Read the article.  It isn't about Gettleman it is about how the draft might fallout based on the Giants move.  This is the offseason and though it won't affect us to much it is a conversation about the draft.

IF you don't like the thread.  DON'T COMMENT...  It is pretty simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You're pretty spot on about how the article reads.

In most years but because they have #4 I think they have more power on the way the draft will go.  Most mocks have them taking Darnold.  However, if they take Barkley that shakes up the top 5 all together.  Plus at number 4 they still will get a "Predicted" Franchise QB.

Long time Brown's reporter Tony Grossi has been arguing vehemently against them taking Barkley. He believes the Browns absolutely must get the right quarterback first because they've screwed it up far too many years in a row..

He may have a point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Long time Brown's reporter Tony Grossi has been arguing vehemently against them taking Barkley. He believes the Browns absolutely must get the right quarterback first because they've screwed it up far too many years in a row..

He may have a point.

They probably will anyhow. :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, top dawg said:

Barkley has to be the first pick.  He just has to be.  I know it's  the Browns,  but even they can't find a way not to take Barkley.  This is a KISS moment if I've ever seen one.  

 

 

 

I also expect them to make a run at AJ McCarron. 

Draft Barkley, trade back in the first, get a tackle and a guard. Throw everything at Cousins. If that doesn't work get Keenum (or bradford and start praying for health). 

Defense gets Peppers back and year 2 and 3 for Garret, Nassib, Ogbah.

This team is seriously that close to playoffs if they get their head out of their ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...