Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jerry Richardson accuser speaks and provides proof


panther4life

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

looking at hard proof and going "pfft that doesn't prove anything" is a popular thing now

Google "Jerry Richardson handwriting" or "handwritten" and you'll find screencaps of notes he's written before.

And yeah, it looks the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rastlet said:

You can shut the hell up too.

Good one, snowflake. What are you 15?

all things considered, old man Richardson is getting off pretty light compared to what may lie in store for Emperor Orangey McOrangeFace once Mr. Mueller is done with him. Paying off women he has harassed and womanized could be the least of President Good Christian’s concerns. 

JR is accused of years of work place sexual harassment and promoting a racially insensitive workplace. His punishment? A little bit of embarrassment and 3 billion dollars to go away. That will teach him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

A lot?

No.

2 or 3 perhaps.   

Fwiw, I bet Gettleman is getting a good laugh out of this.

I actually think it will be a lot.

Guy that used to work there told me a lot of people in the building have been "overpromoted".  Basically, Richardson rewarded people for loyalty by giving them jobs they weren't really qualified for, which is one reason why the team has been so maddeningly inconsistent.

And yes, both Tina Becker and Marty Hurney probably fall into that category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sam Mills Fan said:

People need to start pressuring UNC Charlotte to take his name off the stadium too.

It will happen eventually. I’d almost be willing to bet that it’s off by the time the season kicks off. Not that anyone would notice UNC-Charlotte football anyway. It might actuallly be a really smart PR move for UNCC to do it and hold a presser - would get them some much needed pub. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frash.exe said:

show of hands who didn’t expect ron to take this atrocious scandal and turn it into one of his impassioned rah rah footbawl rallying cries?

Ron is way too smart for that. Also, he knows he can't fug up right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...