Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Showtime: Californication

davos

By davos,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Is it just him going around banging everybody? Not that that's a problem, but Entourage already does that.

I actually like it for the writing and music. He is definitely a womanizer, but a very flawed writer and individual. Californication has really great scripts to show for it. Its definitely not as care free and lazy as Entourage

And its simply a plus to see great tits in the show ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mr beauxjangles Newbie

mr beauxjangles

Posted
Posted

If you just saw the first few episodes of the first season, I could see how you might have been turned off. The Pilot was not very good. But this show has gotten better. And it is hilarious. Yes, it's basically the sexual adventures of Hank Moody, but the family dynamics between Hank and his daughter and the other characters on the show give it more substance.

In my opinion, Entourage has gone downhill a bit and I definitely prefer Californication. Vince is a worthless character at this point. Eric, Ari, Turtle...hell even Lloyd...have more interesting characters than Vince. The only reason I watch is for the other characters. Vince is like a prop now.

Agree that Weeds is better than Californication; the stories are just more intense.

Give Californication a shot. Watch more than one episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah solid show, I like the little MILF on there Pamela Adlon

Weeds IMO has sucked ass the last three seasons, it should of ended after agrestic burned down ever since then its been very contrived.

QFT

I love Weeds, but the last two seasons have been meh, even with Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Off Season Thread

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • PanthersNCSU
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • TD alt
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By TD alt · Posted

      Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...