Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt "Speed bump McGee" Kalil..


Recommended Posts

I've been seeing a lot of huddlers here tear down Matt Kalil like he's the worst left tackle in the NFL. Frankly getting tired of it. But well the huddle is gonna huddle. 

 

The following information if from a person that has access to coaches film and did a break down of every game Matt played in including the Saints playoffs game.. Props for Kevin A. For this information and thank you for your time on doing this.  

----------------------------------------------------------------

Matt Kalil gave up 35 pressures and 5 sacks this season. In weeks 2, 3 and 7 he gave up 17 pressures and 5 sacks. 

So if you exclude the Buffalo, Bears and the first Saints game, you're looking at 18 pressures and 0 sacks. So basically he had 3 horrible games which killed his PFF rating. Outside of that he was solid.

In the playoffs "Speed bump McGee" gave up only 2 pressures. That was the best among all of our lineman except for Trai. Sounds like Saints DE Cam Jordan was salty that Matt was working his ass. In fact, Jordan moved to the right side where he started working RT Daryl Williams because M. Kalil wasn't having it.

Matt Kalil had less penalties and less penalty yards than Nate Solder of the Patriots who many of y'all wanted in free agency. Lane Johnson of the Eagles had 10 penalties - Matt only had 7.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------

So there it is. That's your "Speed bump McGee"  last year.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

 This is a good question, I'll have to ask the person that did the break down how much Norwell influenced this. if at all. 

Any LT is going to be helped or hindered depending on who their guard is.  You probably could take any tackle right or left and see there is a difference in their play if their guard removed or replace.  For the good or bad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass protection was never his major issue as far as I'm concerned. He's not physical in run blocking. He's basically useless. A pylon. He was helped/covered for by Norwell being a monster.

We're a running oriented team. Sooooooo Matt Kalil needs to improve that aspect or GTFO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, lightsout said:

Pass protection was never his major issue as far as I'm concerned. He's not physical in run blocking. He's basically useless. A pylon. He was helped/covered for by Norwell being a monster.

We're a running oriented team. Sooooooo Matt Kalil needs to improve that aspect or GTFO.

Seeing as we're about to become a passing team with Norv.. I feel quite fine with Matt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, lightsout said:

Pass protection was never his major issue as far as I'm concerned. He's not physical in run blocking. He's basically useless. A pylon. He was helped/covered for by Norwell being a monster.

We're a running oriented team. Sooooooo Matt Kalil needs to improve that aspect or GTFO.

I read something from Panthers.com I believe that said instead of rehabbing( hip issue from Viking days) he has been able to strictly hit the weight room this offseason. I am hoping that helps his run blocking. I am optimistic 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not like we're going to replace him this summer.  Even if we would, it's not like a better LT is just sitting at home on his couch, or that a team will trade one away at a reasonable price.  He's our starting Left Tackle.

I appreciate the post, it's good to have something to maybe look forward to or believe in, and a reason not to be afraid of our line play.

EDIT:  I'm old enough to remember when Gross moved to the left side and people who didn't know what they were talking about said he was too soft to run block.  The more things change, the more they remain the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...